# What is the reason to not use reputation points?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-is-the-reason-to-not-use-reputation-points/32961>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [September 6, 2015, 2:25pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-is-the-reason-to-not-use-reputation-points/32961 "2015-09-06T14:25:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erlend\_sh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/erlend_sh/32/119475_2.png) [@erlend\_sh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/erlend_sh)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2015, 3:38pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-is-the-reason-to-not-use-reputation-points/32961/8 "2015-09-06T15:38:13Z")

</div>

> [@geoff777](#):
>
> Perhaps these should be extended between levels 2-3.

That’s yet another different discussion 😉

> [@Are TL3 and TL2 requirements too different?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/are-tl3-and-tl2-requirements-too-different/31353):
>
> Take a look at this: Regular: 32 Member: 827 :- Guess that read 25% of topics created in the last 100 days in a very active forum it’s really hard. For example in meta are 300 topics.. no bad smile Am I wrong? Do you think an intermediate level could be useful?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-is-the-reason-to-not-use-reputation-points/32961)._