# What rebake is required for the new autocomplete styling?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-rebake-is-required-for-the-new-autocomplete-styling/249642>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Tags:** hashtag-autocomplete\
**Created:** [December 17, 2022, 9:09pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-rebake-is-required-for-the-new-autocomplete-styling/249642 "2022-12-17T21:09:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mcdanlj](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mcdanlj/32/131829_2.png) [@mcdanlj](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mcdanlj)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2023, 8:07pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-rebake-is-required-for-the-new-autocomplete-styling/249642/9 "2023-01-03T20:07:10Z")

</div>

Something _very_ like that! I just successfully tested exactly that on my staging site.

I was thinking about the delay option for the `posts:rebake_match` but probably it doesn’t matter.

It is of course insisting on re-processing all the images on the affected posts, which is unnecessary, so an automated fix just for this might reasonably avoid that, but in the meantime there is a way forward.

I might want to do this by reverse ordering and adding a delay if a site has a lot of affected posts.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-rebake-is-required-for-the-new-autocomplete-styling/249642)._