# When not all subcategories have images, their list looks not so good

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/when-not-all-subcategories-have-images-their-list-looks-not-so-good/34242>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [2015年十月7日 22:03 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/when-not-all-subcategories-have-images-their-list-looks-not-so-good/34242 "2015-10-07T22:03:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![meglio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/meglio/32/71444_2.png) [@meglio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/meglio)\
**Post date:** [2015年十月7日 22:03 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/when-not-all-subcategories-have-images-their-list-looks-not-so-good/34242/1 "2015-10-07T22:03:08Z")

</div>

The screenshot below demonstrates how weird the subcategories list looks when not all of them have an image.

It also shows a few possible improvements:

1. Make the title above image, so that all titles are always aligned
2. Make the description to the right of the image, so it uses the space

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/5/d/5d2aed04c7fdace204e16d04a06fb112b50fab74.png)

Not sure if category images can be wide enough to eat all the white space on the right and still be practical, though.

* * *

Another screenshot that demonstrates title misalignment with 2 category images of different width:

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/b/3/b368b87159da7c903d22a68b2edd71fa0d01f62a.png)
