# Where did you get inspirations to make classic UX which 1000's of company accept discourse base theme and adoption?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/where-did-you-get-inspirations-to-make-classic-ux-which-1000s-of-company-accept-discourse-base-theme-and-adoption/226446>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [May 8, 2022, 4:53am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/where-did-you-get-inspirations-to-make-classic-ux-which-1000s-of-company-accept-discourse-base-theme-and-adoption/226446 "2022-05-08T04:53:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKBaseer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jkbaseer/32/80471_2.png) [@JKBaseer](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JKBaseer)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2022, 4:53am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/where-did-you-get-inspirations-to-make-classic-ux-which-1000s-of-company-accept-discourse-base-theme-and-adoption/226446/1 "2022-05-08T04:53:31Z")

</div>

Hey Discourse Community,  
I’m really surprised and wondering how discourse UX/UI made it through until here. Let me clear, am not saying anything about the design quality. I’m asking from a individual business perspective where we usually make apps/web solution for clients as a SaaS product. And we will have have request and demand from clients to make adjustments here/there in the UI.

But if we see discourse, for long time, it was a decent classical theme + additional supported themes by community. And 1000’s of big companies use this for their community software.

How did this companies accepted the fact with less customisation on UI/UX?  
Is it because the solution is not their main product?  
… because the discourse has lot of integrations and gamifications?

I’m trying to learn something from discourse growth.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/where-did-you-get-inspirations-to-make-classic-ux-which-1000s-of-company-accept-discourse-base-theme-and-adoption/226446)._
