# Which forum members create the most work for staff?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/which-forum-members-create-the-most-work-for-staff/80779
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [2월 16, 2018, 10:06오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/which-forum-members-create-the-most-work-for-staff/80779 "2018-02-16T22:06:02Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![erlend\_sh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/erlend_sh/32/119475_2.png) [@erlend\_sh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/erlend_sh)
#### Post date: [2월 18, 2018, 5:51오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/which-forum-members-create-the-most-work-for-staff/80779/6 "2018-02-18T05:51:53Z")

</div>

I really like this idea, but the following is very true:

> [@Mittineague](#):
>
> In my experience I have found that “problem” members tend to get noticed sooner and remembered more easily by moderators than “exemplary” members do.
> 
> In other words, there is little need to “hunt down” problem members, they will become apparent soon enough.

I can see some moderators treating this list with a [“Inbox Zero”](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/zero-dark-inbox) mindset, which could result in over-moderation. But in the right hands this would be a very powerful tool. Definitely worthy plugin-territory for our [upcoming admin dashboard 2.0](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-would-you-like-to-see-on-your-discourse-admin-dashboard/67134).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/which-forum-members-create-the-most-work-for-staff/80779)._