# Why are some WordPress links Oneboxed, and others are not?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-are-some-wordpress-links-oneboxed-and-others-are-not/28778>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [Maio 13, 2015, 5:16pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-are-some-wordpress-links-oneboxed-and-others-are-not/28778 "2015-05-13T17:16:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BCHK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/bchk/32/3268_2.png) [@BCHK](https://meta.discourse.org/u/BCHK)\
**Post date:** [Abril 15, 2016, 7:50pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-are-some-wordpress-links-oneboxed-and-others-are-not/28778/18 "2016-04-15T19:50:27Z")

</div>

> [@tobiaseigen](#):
>
> If so perhaps we can contribute back the code here for the benefit of other wordpress people who don’t want to use the [domain.com/year/month/day/title](http://domain.com/year/month/day/title) url syntax.

I’m using this format for my wordpress blog (/?p=740 ) - and unfortunately you can’t change it after you’ve started using it. Any chance this could be supported. Seems like one of the main options for Wordpress users. It would be nice if we could just “whitelist” certain domains that you know are either your domains or you know are wordpress domains - so can easily be oneboxed.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-are-some-wordpress-links-oneboxed-and-others-are-not/28778)._