# Why doesn't 404 page search locally instead of google?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-doesnt-404-page-search-locally-instead-of-google/62547>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [5월 11, 2017, 8:29오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-doesnt-404-page-search-locally-instead-of-google/62547 "2017-05-11T20:29:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)\
**Post date:** [5월 11, 2017, 8:29오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-doesnt-404-page-search-locally-instead-of-google/62547/1 "2017-05-11T20:29:59Z")

</div>

[https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-wrong-or-stupid-slug](https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-wrong-or-stupid-slug) returns the

### Oops! That page doesn’t exist or is private.

page with some recent topics and at the bottom

### Search this site

but it uses a Google search. This is worthless for sites that aren’t indexed, if instead it returned a list of local searches, or, better, the search page.

This would come close to solving my “I can’t guess the slugs” problem for an import.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-doesnt-404-page-search-locally-instead-of-google/62547)._