This isn’t true for software that runs on a server, right? The GPL only forces you to give the source to users who are actually running your software. So I guess Discourse being GPL might force people running publicly-accessible modified instances to give back contributions to the JS code at best (it runs on the user’s machine), but not the server code. That would require AGPL. Is the JS part the original reasoning behind choosing GPL? Because otherwise it’s basically the same as choosing an MIT license.
obvio171
14
相关话题
| 话题 | 回复 | 浏览量 | 活动 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does the use of private plugins breach the terms of the GNU GPL v2? | 18 | 6451 | 2017 年6 月 23 日 | |
| GPL license for modified discourse for own website | 9 | 933 | 2020 年3 月 22 日 | |
| A question on GPL licensing and the current WordPress debacle | 15 | 10291 | 2022 年11 月 19 日 | |
| Are paid plugins with undisclosed license allowed to exist on meta? | 28 | 4726 | 2017 年8 月 30 日 | |
| How can I tell if a particular distribution of the Discourse client is free software? | 39 | 1146 | 2024 年11 月 19 日 |