# מדוע לא ניתן להשבית תיקוני פוסטים עבור מנהלים?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-post-revisions-cannot-be-disabled-for-admins/267843>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [9 ביוני,‏ 2023,‏ 11:22pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-post-revisions-cannot-be-disabled-for-admins/267843 "2023-06-09T23:22:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![maiki](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/maiki/32/233950_2.png) [@maiki](https://meta.discourse.org/u/maiki)\
**Post date:** [9 ביוני,‏ 2023,‏ 11:42pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-post-revisions-cannot-be-disabled-for-admins/267843/2 "2023-06-09T23:42:54Z")

</div>

Hi @PintoBean. 👋

> [@PintoBean](#):
>
> I’m wondering why there isn’t an option to disable history/revisions for certain users or groups of users such as those who bear the legal responsibilities of running the forum?

I don’t think it comes up very often. 🙂

In my experience, the majority of post revisions are for typos, fixing links, and those kinds of edits.

In the example you shared…

> [@PintoBean](#):
>
> This means that if an admin posts
> 
> > Ten fine paragraphs.  
> > One sensitive/problematic statement.  
> > Ten more fine paragraphs.
> 
> and edits it to become
> 
> > Ten fine paragraphs.  
> > Ten more fine paragraphs.

…if the admin users on your forums keep doing this over and over, it may indicate they need training to understand how to prevent sharing sensitive information.

I would guess that most communities won’t have admin users populating post revisions with inappropriate information and, therefore, the system works well as is.

Does that make sense? 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-post-revisions-cannot-be-disabled-for-admins/267843)._