# Wiki topic mini spec

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** rfc, spec\
**Created:** [21 Marzo 2014, 10:44am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966 "2014-03-21T10:44:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lightyear](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@lightyear](https://meta.discourse.org/u/lightyear)\
**Post date:** [21 Marzo 2014, 12:46pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966/2 "2014-03-21T12:46:41Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> That said if the community would like to contribute a PR in this department we would be more than happy to review, and if good merge.

Yes, indeed. Looking into that.

> [@sam](#):
>
> 1. Add a column to posts wiki not nullable bit, default 0.
> 2. Any post that has wiki=1 is editable by all logged on users.

hee… that feels a little puzzling to me. I was thinking of implementing it as its own “archetype” because that’s what I thought it was for. Though this solution sounds much easier and very straight forward, you mind to explain what the “archetype” system is meant for if not cases like this?

I’m fine doing it either way and most definetly in a way that it gets merged faster, but if I do it, I might as well do it right from the beginning, so if archetypes are more appropriate, let me know ..

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966)._
