# Wiki topic mini spec

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** rfc, spec\
**Created:** [2014 年 3 月 21 日午前 10:44 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966 "2014-03-21T10:44:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [2014 年 3 月 22 日午前 2:28 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966/5 "2014-03-22T02:28:17Z")

</div>

That is a strong argument in favor of this not being a topic archetype. I don’t think it should be. Archetypes are for entire topics that have unique behaviors, they are not intended for individual posts that have slightly different behavior as in this case.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wiki-topic-mini-spec/13966)._