# Wording for private/secure categories

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/wording-for-private-secure-categories/75643
**Category:** UX
**Created:** [December 7, 2017, 7:48pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wording-for-private-secure-categories/75643 "2017-12-07T19:48:18Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![alehandrof](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/alehandrof/32/119526_2.png) [@alehandrof](https://meta.discourse.org/u/alehandrof)
#### Post date: [December 9, 2017, 7:04am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wording-for-private-secure-categories/75643/14 "2017-12-09T07:04:55Z")

</div>

> [@tophee](#):
>
> Nice. How did you do it?

I may have oversold by using the word “built” 😃

All I’ve done is use the built-in description settings to link the category from group and vice-versa. I just made sure that the icons and descriptions align well.

What’s unusual (but unrelated) is the “Groups” nav item visible in the category screenshot. That’s just a [theme component to provide a link to the group page](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-groups-to-top-nav/65193).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wording-for-private-secure-categories/75643)._