# WYSIWYG editor as a replacement

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/wysiwyg-editor-as-a-replacement/21373
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** completed
**Created:** [October 21, 2014, 11:08am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wysiwyg-editor-as-a-replacement/21373 "2014-10-21T11:08:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![downey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/downey/32/166878_2.png) [@downey](https://meta.discourse.org/u/downey)
#### Post date: [October 21, 2014, 3:26pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wysiwyg-editor-as-a-replacement/21373/2 "2014-10-21T15:26:01Z")

</div>

Covered in more detail here (I searched for “WYSIWYG”):

> [@More advance editor should be here?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-advance-editor-should-be-here/14102):
>
> I have some exprence in taking notes of math in the Editor: [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/), while the discouse editor (what’s her name?) is my first forum editor that support markdown and mathjax at the same time with perfect preview, it seems that there are still have some space to make it more perfect, compare with StackEdit: a table of content guide of a rather length topic: in stackedit, we can just put a shortcode called [toc] to make a table of content with links the particial render of mathjax is also qu…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wysiwyg-editor-as-a-replacement/21373)._