Cool, thanks for that.
I thought that might be the case, but changing the message resulted in an update, so I don’t think it’s caching - it’s something encoding incorrectly.
I suggested a few options, but in the end, the infra team opted to just go with packages built using the build service. I don’t think it’s a “we hate docker” thing (though podman would probably be more likely what they’d want to use), but more a way of using the configuration management tools they’re using to manage everything in the same manner. Having a one-off that uses Docker/podman would add other complexities to using the CI/CD setup they’re using (or so I understand).
So ultimately, I set up my two sandboxes to be able to determine where issues are rooted so I could report them to the proper place; unfortunately, that means that when it is something in how we’ve built things, I have to chase down what we’re doing different from a standard Docker-based installation so we can fix it.