I activated ai translations on my self-hosted Discourse server yesterday. Everything is going well… sort of. The translation progress graph is either not refreshing or inaccurate. Here is what I am seeing: [image] This would indicate that I am at 99% for all posts since Feb 23, 2026. This is not accurate. I have roughly 3,000 posts for this timeframe. Based on the translation logs, it is currently working on posts from about 6 days ago. So, does anyone know: What is the refresh rate for this graph? The data explorer query for posts waiting to be translated? The data explorer query for posts translated? The data explorer query for posts that was tried to translate but failed do to some error/reason. Thank you in advance.

[imagem] LotusJeff: What is the refresh rate for this graph? We had to cache this page as it was timing out on big sites. [imagem] LotusJeff: This is not accurate. I have roughly 3,000 posts for this timeframe. Based on the translation logs, it is currently working on posts from about 6 days ago. The translation has basically two steps: Detect post original language Translate to every other language At the beginning, your site will mostly be stuck doing step 1, which we initially showed in this translation progress page but have since removed because feedback said it was “too much information”. That said, this is good feedback. The progress page cache and lack of information of locale detection is making the experience here awful at the beginning of the process. Last thing, we set the backfill rate very conservatively, you may want to increase it according to your budget.

I would suggest considering a simpler reporting approach. Based on my understanding, the translation process works in two stages: Translate eligible topic data. Translate eligible post data. From an administrative and reporting perspective, I am less interested in what is currently in flight and more interested in overall progress against the eligible workload. I would prefer to see reporting based on the configured translation eligibility rules. For example: Status Backfill settings are configured to translate all content created after February 23, 2026. Area Total Eligible Translated Completed Topics 25,000 540 450 83% Posts 400,000 3,700 800 22% Failed Translations Post ID Reason 34543 Malformed characters on line xxxx The current graph appears to show operational activity, which is certainly useful. However, what I really want to understand is how much of the eligible work has been completed. Personally, I am not very interested in completion percentages by language. A topic or post is either translated or it is not. The key question for me is how much of the configured backlog has been processed successfully. This approach also seems like it would be more database-friendly since it focuses on aggregate counts rather than tracking progress across every language combination. If language-specific reporting is still valuable, perhaps it could be exposed through a filter. An administrator could select a language and view the same progress table for that language only. Just some thoughts. p.s. [imagem] Falco: We had to cache this page as it was timing out on big sites. What is the current cache timeframe?

I have been working on the data explorer SQL to create the report listed above. I am not a SQL expert, but these are working. The queries below will provide this level of information. Translation Status Report Area Eligible Translated To Be Translated Topics 540 450 90 Posts 3,700 800 2900 Topics: -- Setup: -- Upate sql your translation settings -- Days to Backfill - Interval 'xxx' -- Category to ignore - Category_id NOT IN () -- Topic type - Regular or private_message -- -- Translation status: -- Total Topics to translate: comment out both 'and topics.locale' where statements -- Topics not translated: uncomment only - topics.locale is null -- Topics translated: uncomment only - topics.local = 'en' SELECT count(distinct topics.id) FROM topics JOIN posts ON topics.id = posts.topic_id WHERE posts.created_at >= NOW() - INTERVAL '100 days' AND posts.user_id > 0 AND topics.category_id NOT IN (22,3) AND topics.archetype = 'regular' -- AND topics.locale = 'en' -- AND topics.locale is null Posts: -- Setup: -- Upate sql your translation settings -- Days to Backfill - Interval 'xxx' -- Category to ignore - Category_id NOT IN () -- Topic type - Regular or private_message -- -- Translation status: -- Total posts to translate: comment out both 'and posts.locale' where statements -- posts not translated: uncomment only - posts.locale is null -- posts translated: uncomment only - posts.locale = 'en' SELECT count(*) FROM posts JOIN topics ON topics.id = posts.topic_id WHERE posts.created_at >= NOW() - INTERVAL '100 days' AND posts.user_id > 0 AND topics.category_id NOT IN (22,3) AND topics.archetype = 'regular' -- AND posts.locale = 'en' -- AND posts.locale is null

Thanks a ton for the feedback @LotusJeff I’m noting down some of your points here and will make improvements soon™ (probably July). Re: the DE queries, let me get back to you tomorrow for a more precise one.

[imagem] nat: let me get back to you tomorrow Tomorrow took a while… I had contemplated just responding to you with another data explorer query, but I agree the translation progress graph could do with an improvement and it is timely to do so. Here’s a quick update on what we’ve done: loading :skull: Cosmetic, but always nice [loading] Cached timing and progress per content type The loading time for this page is going to be very long because of posts. We already have a cache (2h), and will indicate as well. Since we also do more than posts and topics now, we show progress for them. [breakdown] Here's an idea of what it will look like when it's incomplete [incomplete example] Per-locale breakdown for each content type This level of detail is actually quite time-consuming to query for, and are details that don’t always need to be seen, so we only show them when the admin wants to see it. [further breakdown] This is now available, so just update your site and you should be all set.

I have been traveling for the last couple of days and was able to update tonight. This is way more useful and self-explanatory. It has a nice overview of what is being translated. Being able to drill into the details by topics and posts is also helpful. The only thing that appears off is the help icon contents for Eligible within topics/posts. It says “Content already in this language excluded”. This should be the total population waiting to be translated. Minor tweak. Great job and thank you for making this improvement to the translation status page. Now, if we could set translations to a date-specific date rather than days in the past to remove the topic/post translation mismatch. I would not have to do any manual tweaking of the translation settings to keep posts and topics date-concurrent. [imagem] Request for a date picker in AI Translate settings Feature Minor Feature request. In the AI Translate Settings field: AI translation backfill max age days Can we get a date picker implemented with this field? For us folks who have forums with content going back decades (1999). It means we are older and don’t want to deal with math in our heads. grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes

[imagem] LotusJeff: Now, if we could set translations to a date-specific date Agree. Will chime in on that topic.

Gráfico de Progresso da Tradução por IA

Comunidade Dados e relatórios

nat (Natalie T) 27 Julho , 2026 10:02 11

Concordo. Vou entrar nessa discussão.

Tópico		Respostas	Vistas
Request for a date picker in AI Translate settings Feature completed , ai , dynaloc , content-localization	5	387	28 Julho , 2026
AI setting tells translations are disabled when enabled Bug ai , content-localization	21	651	1 Setembro , 2025
AI translation backfill not working after all settings configured Product Support ai , content-localization	34	1434	13 Novembro , 2025
Why topics translate faster than posts Product Support ai , content-localization	1	176	26 Junho , 2026
AI translation of all PMs Feature ai , content-localization	6	410	31 Março , 2026

Gráfico de Progresso da Tradução por IA

Related topics