A safeguard to reduce necroposting

There is already have a dialog that shows a warning when you are about to necropost, but what about accidental misclicks? My idea was to implement a dialog box before replying that would warn the user “Are you sure you want to post this, this topic is 2 years old” as a warning. That way in the situation where you accidentally quote a reply and tap the reply button on a old topic, or for newer members this warning will show up.

My idea:

  1. User attempts to reply to old topic.
  2. The built-in warning shows up.
  3. User tries to reply to topic
  4. The new warning I am suggesting comes up as a further safeguard to prevent accident posts.
  5. If the warning is read and they want to post it, the reply will still be posted.

Now that I think about it, there used to be a necropost warning in old topics, but that is been gone lately in modern discourse?

2 לייקים

Edit: I had realized the necropost warning has simply vanished. You can move this to a separate bug report if needed but the realization after making this feature request had kicked in.


This first image is from a forum running a much newer forum software.

This second image is from a forum running older forum software.

לייק 1

It was removed in June

לייק 1

But there is a warning of a similar kind that still exists. It warns you if you replied to the same user in the same thread 3 times. It asks you to consider continuing in a private message thread.

What is the connection between the warning about reviving an old topic and the “get a room” popup? I didn’t say all pop-up messages were removed.

2 לייקים

You are right, the connection is weak and in no way I wanted to suggest that your statement was incorrect. It seems to me that the topic might be more general about a whole category of messages that educate forum members about how to behave (soft rules, let’s say). That’s my connection.

So to me it’s interesting that some rules are gone and some very similar rules stay.

The pull request actually mentions that sequential replies warning has been removed, even though it hasn’t.

Why are these removed? They were useful!

Quite strange, there was a software change to improve some texts and then within a week or two a second change - by the same person - to remove some.

Was this discussed anywhere? Is there some leadership input on this?

As there were site settings to control them, it seems wrong to remove them. Especially without discussion. What place for the community?

I strongly suggest updating the title of this topic.

לייק 1