A user, TimothyDonaghue, asked about how to handle a situation where a user deleted hundreds of their posts, leaving behind “deleted” comments that resemble spam. The discussion centered around the relationship between post deletion and account deletion.
codinghorror mentioned built-in rate limits on post deletion, but users can still delete all their posts if they are patient. dje4321 clarified that the “delete all posts max” feature only applies to moderators and administrators when deleting whole accounts.
cpradio suggested that the “post edit time limit” site setting can be used to control post deletion. codinghorror expressed surprise that the setting affects deletion, and cpradio confirmed that it is tightly coupled with the edit feature.
The discussion also touched on the European GDPR legislation’s “Right to be Forgotten” and how it relates to deleting user content. markwilkin mentioned that this legislation provides a framework for handling user requests to delete their content.
AstonJ argued that forums are different from social networks, and users should not be able to delete their posts after a certain time limit. codinghorror suggested using the “post edit time limit” site setting to control post deletion.
The conversation also explored the topic of copyright and intellectual property rights on forums. mlgtechuser asked about specific legal cases covering forums and copyright ownership. Jagster explained that public domain licensing is not specific to forums and that copyright laws vary by country.
HAWK pointed out that Discourse’s terms of service grant users full control and ownership of their content, with reasonable exceptions for Discourse and other users. mlgtechuser appreciated the liberal terms but wondered about the default “common law” terms in the absence of an explicit terms of use.
The discussion concluded that instance owners can create different contracts with their users, and that the terms of service can vary between Discourse instances.