This method of filling in the draft sounds like it would change the process. The process of requiring edits until compliance through the review system is roughly as follows:
- User posts → flagged by system → moderator team marks as “Request Revision” → user edits text → moderator team marks “Request Revision” → user edits text → … → moderator team “Approval” → post successfully published
If the text to be edited is filled via a draft, the process would be:
- User posts → flagged by system → moderator team marks “Request Revision” → user reposts → (possibly) flagged again …
This is an external process, not completed through the review system; it merely keeps bombarding the review system when non-compliant. That is to say, the edited post can always be published on the public page, even if it might be flagged again, but it does not require continuous revision until manually approved.