Curious if there was any reasoning why emoji can’t be inserted into topic titles. I’m sure it could be abused - but so could emoji use in general
Additionally could use it to designate topic features:
I just realized that my users can’t tell which posts might have cool sample files to download.
what are some ways I could mark a topic with this icon? (the download one)
thanks!
Possibly a feature limited by trust level.
5개의 좋아요
riking
(Kane York)
4월 5, 2015, 9:50오후
2
I think it’s more of a “late to the party” situation. No real reason why they aren’t allowed there, and you can still use the Unicode versions (they’ll only show up in color on mobile + Mac, though).
1개의 좋아요
elberet
(Jens Maier)
4월 6, 2015, 1:30오전
4
4개의 좋아요
Unbridled use is likely to pollute the list pages with “look at ME” use that has nothing to do with the topic.
elberet
(Jens Maier)
4월 6, 2015, 1:49오전
6
Exactly, but it might be a useful feature for community managers to direct attention to interesting topics that scales differently than pinning.
Yeah I think it’s worth considering, but only for certain trust levels. Probably TL2 and higher.
jesselperry:
Probably TL2 and higher.
or, as admin, I just go remove them and let the OP know why…
2개의 좋아요
Just added this feature. It’s not restricted yet. Let’s see if users indeed abuse it before adding more code
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/2d03163be0db145c3f4a41db95ce845c32651856
11개의 좋아요
I think this depends on when the new code shows up vs the next beta getting cut.
2개의 좋아요
cpradio
(cpradio)
6월 15, 2015, 2:53오후
12
Just so I don’t pass along incorrect information to SP, this is permitted now based on whether emojis are enabled or not correct?
It isn’t a separate site setting to permit them in Topic Titles (which is fine, just making sure I understand the git commit changes).
2개의 좋아요
That’s correct . It’s currently using the same setting.
3개의 좋아요
One tweak we should maybe make @zogstrip :
Titles could be converted into unicode emoji, at least for the browser. Low pri of course..
6개의 좋아요