Are Moderated User Invites a thing?

功能
,
1

I can only seem to give moderators and admin invite permission, or allow all users above the trust threshold to have invite permissions. I am looking for a moderated user invite option if it exists, if not perhaps this belongs in feature as this is helpful for closed communites where we want to allow high trust users to invite but still be aware of new users and such in the moderator team.

So is Moderated User Invites a thing? Users send, moderators get notice to approve. If so, how do I do that? I have had a harder time tuning the install than I did installing docker in a multisocket environment for the first time! Thanks for the help from everyone in support so far and I’m sure in the future.

2 个赞
3

To clarify, you’re asking if there is a way that all invites need to be approved by a moderator before they are sent?

Assuming yes, then no, that doesn’t currently exist.

4 个赞
6

That’s one implementation, another possible implementation is that after invitation a moderator must “enable” the account.
Either way would be great as the discourse based system in working on is designed to be a semi closed system with referrals. For now I guess moderators have to act as the gatekeepers.

2 个赞
7

There is a site setting called something like “must approve all users”. I think that is what you’re looking for.

3 个赞
8

This setting removes all invite permissions for non staff members.
We were looking more for a system that the users issue the invites themselves, and a moderator approves them after they accept invitation. We’re exploring other options here, but the membership seems super resistant to having invites only in the hands of the moderators…

3 个赞
9

我也想知道是否找到了可行的解决方案。

10

我的做法是设置一个任何人都可以加入的“等候室”，然后将“真正的社区”放在受群组限制的类别中。以下是它的工作方式：

  1. 任何人都可以不受限制地加入 Discourse。
  2. 创建一个任何人都可以看到的类别。根据社区的实际情况，它可以是只读的或不受限制的。
  3. 创建一个封闭群组，只有在群组所有者批准后才能加入。
  4. 决定谁可以成为群组所有者，并让他们成为群组的所有者。 :wink: 这可以是版主、工作人员或您喜欢的任何人。
  5. 创建[对封闭群组有限制的新类别。真正的社区将在这里参与。

开放式等候室的一个优点是，新成员可以在真正加入之前询问有关社区的问题。但我认为，将等候室设置为静态的，只有一个主题来解释这个过程，也会奏效。

11

太棒了，我喜欢这个解决方案，也很感谢你花时间写得如此清晰。我会测试一下看看效果如何，谢谢！

编辑：我遇到的唯一问题是，每个新类别都需要被限制……有没有一种方法可以让我只创建一个不受限制的类别，而不是必须创建除一个之外的所有类别都受限制？

12

手动之外？据我所知没有。但你需要新类别的频率是多少？ :wink:

1 个赞
13

说得有理，我不确定。我想象着随着社区的增长，人们可能会创建很多子类别，但 1) 可能他们不会，2) 我认为子类别可以继承主类别的权限。所以也许会没问题的 :slightly_smiling_face:

14

当然，每个社区都不同，但人们在组织方面本质上是懒惰的。 :wink: 以我的经验来看，人们会尽量避免创建 新主题。当人们询问新类别时，他们常常希望有人能发布相关主题，但当类别实际创建后，他们却不会使用。最好避免创建新的子类别，直到它们变得显而易见且有必要为止。

正确。你可以让子类别 更 严格，但 Discourse 不允许你让它 不那么 严格。

1 个赞
15

确实如此。分类本身并不会产生讨论。因此，如果某个标签获得了大量主题，并且这些主题与其他分类的交叉不多，那么就可能存在对该分类的需求。

2 个赞