When a backup to S3 runs nightly, it pretty much requires that the disk size be at least 2x the space used. On my 200GB disk, Discourse uses about 50% and during the backup, disk use jumps to just over 90% until the backup is uploaded to S3. [backups takong up disk space] I’m curious if there is …

There was a plan: Reduce local disk space needs by not (redundantly) gzipping backups [immagine] Reduce local disk space needs by not (redundantly) gzipping backups Development of that feature is currently paused and it isn’t on our current roadmap. I hope we will get to it in 2024.

Il backup richiede il doppio dello spazio su disco: il processo potrebbe essere migliorato?

Supporto

Ed_S (Ed S) 14 Agosto 2025, 7:51am 2

C’era un piano:
Riduci le esigenze di spazio su disco locale non (ridondantemente) comprimendo i backup con gzip

Argomento		Risposte	Visualizzazioni
Better auto-backup options Feature backups , s3	4	2048	Dicembre 4, 2025
How can I tell how much disk space might would be needed for an auto backup? Self-hosting server-resources	0	493	Luglio 23, 2020
'Download remote images to local' disabled despite enough free disk space Support	3	73	Agosto 23, 2025
Discourse not respecting the number of S3 backups to keep Self-hosting backups , s3	8	962	Aprile 10, 2024
Does using S3 for uploads mean redownloading all files when creating backups? Support	7	1292	Settembre 13, 2020

Il backup richiede il doppio dello spazio su disco: il processo potrebbe essere migliorato?

Argomenti correlati