When a backup to S3 runs nightly, it pretty much requires that the disk size be at least 2x the space used. On my 200GB disk, Discourse uses about 50% and during the backup, disk use jumps to just over 90% until the backup is uploaded to S3. [backups takong up disk space] I’m curious if there is …

There was a plan: Reduce local disk space needs by not (redundantly) gzipping backups [imagem] Reduce local disk space needs by not (redundantly) gzipping backups Development of that feature is currently paused and it isn’t on our current roadmap. I hope we will get to it in 2024.

Backup requer 2x espaço em disco - o processo pode ser melhorado?

Suporte

Ed_S (Ed S) 14 Agosto , 2025 07:51 2

Havia um plano:
Reduzir a necessidade de espaço em disco local não compactando (redundantemente) backups

Tópico		Respostas	Vistas
Better auto-backup options Feature backups , s3	3	2072	3 Agosto , 2017
How can I tell how much disk space might would be needed for an auto backup? Self-hosting server-resources	0	505	23 Julho , 2020
'Download remote images to local' disabled despite enough free disk space Support	2	106	23 Agosto , 2025
Discourse not respecting the number of S3 backups to keep Self-hosting backups , s3	7	982	10 Abril , 2024
Does using S3 for uploads mean redownloading all files when creating backups? Support	6	1334	14 Agosto , 2020

Backup requer 2x espaço em disco - o processo pode ser melhorado?

Related topics