Best practices for archiving topics

[tobiaseigen]

What are best practices for archiving topics? I’ve not used this feature before, and don’t fully understand what happens when you archive something and when we should use it. Appreciate any explanation/links

[cpradio]

Should closing a topic remove wiki edit-ability?

There is no such thing as locking a topic. Do you mean close? If so then yes, as the description for close indicates, this is correct. Close only prevents new replies, that is all. Archive freezes the topic in carbonite, preventing any changes at all, it becomes a stone monument, or tombstone, depending on how you look at it…

We don’t use archive on our instance (except our staging instance where we like to try and break things), so I can’t really say when to use each as we don’t focus on archive at all in our live site.

[Mittineague]

A lot depends on your edit time window and much work your Mods feel like doing.

eg. if you have a very long edit time window, you may want to archive an older discussion so posts don’t get edited into something not desirable.

We’ve found that having a shorter edit time window (many have complained that it’s too short) and auto-closing topics that gone dormant works well.

[codinghorror (Jeff Atwood)]

It’s a subtle distinction but

Close only prevents new replies.

and

Archive freezes a topic in carbonite so nothing about it can ever change. Ever.

Refer to this handy diagram:

The idea is that archived topics would eventually be moved out or deleted. Archiving a topic means it has one foot in the grave.

[kensims]

My main set of categories are configured with auto-close. I don’t plan to ever archive in those categories.

I have an Admin category for Administrative Announcements. Everyone can read, but only Staff can create and reply. This category is not configured for auto-close, but I archive topics when they are no longer applicable.

[tobiaseigen]

Thanks everyone - and esp @codinghorror for the amusing visual. I think I actually understand pretty clearly what happens when you archive a topic, but I am still wrapping my head around why we would use archiving. Looks like we just won’t use it.

I will reflect on auto-closing of topics as well - that’s an interesting thought. Thanks @kensims. One of the issues we are running into is that we go back and close topics that are old, because the discussions have run their course. But that then bumps them up in lists and generates notifications which is unfortunate, and causes some complaints because people think they should be paying attention to them.

[cpradio]

@tobiaseigen

One of the issues we are running into is that we go back and close topics that are old, because the discussions have run their course. But that then bumps them up in lists and generates notifications which is unfortunate, and causes some complaints because people think they should be paying attention to them.

This was fixed… It should only notify the OP and it definitely no longer bumps the topic…

[tobiaseigen]

@cpradio

OP

OP means Original Poster?

@cpradio

It should only notify the OP and it definitely no longer bumps the topic…

That would be good. Thanks for clarifying. What about moderators? Do moderators get notified?

[cpradio]

OP = Original Poster

@tobiaseigen

What about moderators? Do moderators get notified?

Well they likely closed it… so no they don’t. If they were watching the category/topic, it does appear under the Unread tab (may not be true for auto-close), but nothing in the notifications area.

[tobiaseigen]

Ah - so we have a category that we require everyone to watch. When a topic is closed in that category, does everyone get notified?

[cpradio]

In the Unread tab, yes, an actual Notification in the top right - no.

Again, may not apply for auto-close, but it seems to apply for a moderator closing a topic (based on the experience I have at Sitepoint and here at Meta)

[calmh (Jakob Borg)]

Is there a difference in search engine visibility for Archived topics? I for one would like to see archived topics be not-indexed by Google and co., and be invisible or deprioritized in the in-Discourse search. This for many of the reasons stated here, but still leaving the topic around for people who have the link or otherwise know where it is…

[codinghorror (Jeff Atwood)]

I think that is a very good idea and would be another important point of distinction between closed. @techapj can you add this to your list?

[riking (Kane York)]

I’m not sure that “archived = hidden” is a good line to draw. Alternatively, you could do something crazy like automatically submitting archived topics to www.archive.org.

[TechnoBear]

I always understood an archive to be a place of public record, to be referenced when required. So I assumed the purpose of archiving a topic was to ensure a particularly-important topic remained preserved and unchanged - like locking cells in a spreadsheet to prevent accidental changes.

This sounds more like bundling up old business records, ready to throw them out when they get beyond the seven-year limit (or whatever the local legal requirement is). I’m not sure quite what I’d call that, but it wouldn’t be archiving.

[cpradio]

@codinghorror

I think that is a very good idea and would be another important point of distinction between closed. @techapj can you add this to your list?

@riking

I’m not sure that “archived = hidden” is a good line to draw. Alternatively, you could do something crazy like automatically submitting archived topics to www.archive.org.

Yeah, I don’t like that idea either. They can unlist if they want it hidden from Search Engines, why should Archived be removed?

Archived simply means you want to store it in its original state, you don’t want it modified. It would be similar to a static page which are still visible to search engines.

There is already a solution for this, they can unlist it and archive it. Done. Bam. Easy. Archive does not equal invisible.

With the change proposed, it is impossible for me to save a discussion in its current state without making it invisible/impossible to find. That’s frustrating.

Definition of archive:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/archive

Keywords: “Long term storage”

What if all of the important documents from our history were archived in the way you’ve outlined? They would be nearly impossible to find by new users because they don’t have a link to it. Hardly the best use of long term storage, yes?

[cpradio]

@cpradio

We don’t use archive on our instance (except our staging instance where we like to try and break things), so I can’t really say when to use each as we don’t focus on archive at all in our live site.

So it seems we do actually have a few archived topics (over 20 pages worth). So the impact on us is real (just an FYI).

[codinghorror (Jeff Atwood)]

@cpradio

There is already a solution for this, they can unlist it and archive it. Done. Bam. Easy. Archive does not equal invisible.

Yes that is an even better idea. @techapj make it so unlisting a topic removes it from Google search results by adding the no index header.

[DeanMarkTaylor (Dean Taylor)]

تم تحديث هذا المنشور وإعادة نشره هنا:

Understanding closed, unlisted, and archived topics

This guide explains the differences between Closed, Unlisted, and Archived topics in Discourse, including their characteristics and use cases. Required user level: All users Discourse offers various ways to manage topics, including closing, unlisting, and archiving. Each of these options serves a different purpose and has specific effects on how topics are displayed and interacted with. This guide will explain the differences between these three states and th…

المنشور الأصلي أدناه

---

كنت أحاول فهم الفرق بين «أرشفة» موضوع و«إغلاقه»، فتتتبت الكود وأعددت بعض الملاحظات التي أردت مشاركتها.

أود فقط التأكيد مرة أخرى على أن منشور @codinghorror هنا يُظهر هذه الوظيفة بشكل بصري واضح جدًا:

@codinghorror

الفرق دقيق، لكن

الإغلاق يمنع فقط الردود الجديدة.

و

الأرشفة تجمّد الموضوع في الكربونيت بحيث لا يمكن تغيير أي شيء فيه أبدًا. أبدًا.

راجع هذا الرسم التوضيحي المفيد:

الفكرة هي أن المواضيع المؤرشفة ستُنقل في النهاية أو تُحذف. أرشفة موضوع تعني أن له قدمًا في القبر.

##إذن، كيف تقارن «الأرشفة» بـ «الإغلاق» لموضوع؟

###مشتركان في كليهما

• يعرض أيقونة «قفل» بجانب الموضوع في القوائم.
  • من الممكن ظهور أيقونتي قفل إذا كان الموضوع مغلقًا ومؤرشفًا معًا: Close and Archive a Topic
• يعطّل الرد على الموضوع.
• يعطّل التصويت.
• يعطّل زر «دعوة» في أسفل الموضوع.
• إغلاق أو أرشفة موضوع لا يغيّر تاريخ آخر نشاط له.

###خاصة بالمواضيع المؤرشفة

• يعطّل قدرة المستخدمين على حذف منشور.
• يعطّل الإعجابات.
• يعطّل العرض في صفحة «كل الفئات» و«الأحدث» (عادةً الصفحة الرئيسية للمستخدمين المسجلين).
• يعطّل عرض الموضوع في صفحة /top.
• يعطّل إدراجه في رسائل البريد الإلكتروني الموجزة.
• يعطّل عرض الموضوع في قائمة «عشوائي» في تذييل صفحة الموضوع.
• يظل يسمح برفع تقارير عن الموضوع أو المنشورات.
• يظل يسمح بوضع الإشارات المرجعية.
• يظل معروضًا في قائمة غير المقروءة (أي ترى المنشور مع علامة «مؤرشف»، وهذا مقصود).

##إلى أين تذهب هذه المواضيع؟

• يمكنك رؤية المواضيع المؤرشفة عبر معامل استعلام status=archived: Discourse Meta
• يمكنك ما زال رؤية المواضيع المؤرشفة عند تصفّح فئة محددة.

##المستقبل

ولاحظت أيضًا هذا التعليق، الذي يشير إلى أن معنى الأرشفة النهائي قد يتغير:

@codinghorror

أعتقد أن هذا نقاش أعمق حول ما تعنيه حالة أرشفة الموضوع وما ينبغي أن تفعله — لكن نعم، الأرشفة تعني «النقل إلى تخزين بارد في مرحلة ما»، ويجب أن نحدّد ذلك في النهاية.

هناك نقاش إضافي في هذا الموضوع:
How should category archiving work?

إذا لاحظت خطأً أو حدث تغيير ما، يرجى الرد على هذا المنشور — سأحدّثه.
ربما يمكن أن يكون هذا بداية لمنشور مواصفات للمواضيع المؤرشفة؟

[mcwumbly (Dave McClure)]

My 2 cents for added features:

• archived topics should also behave like unlisted topics
• should be excluded from search by default
• should not be crawled by bots.
• should remain available to search with a special search operator (include:archived or something?)
• should remain available to those with a link

In other words, they should be put in a state where they are out of the way enough you don’t have to delete them.

(or should those be just features of ‘unlisted’ and a shortcut could exist to “archive and unlist”?)