This bug has returned.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/cookies-required-for-read-only-anonymous-browsing/17362
Yes Discourse, this is similar to the post about the same bug when I posted it a year ago. It’s back.
This bug has returned.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/cookies-required-for-read-only-anonymous-browsing/17362
Yes Discourse, this is similar to the post about the same bug when I posted it a year ago. It’s back.
Thanks, should be fixed with
Why did we regress here again?
My guess is that we refucktored something 
We still need a robust smoke test to ensure this can not happen.
Basically anon should work even with cookies disabled, that is the test.
We need to stub localStorage to dish out exceptions in phantom to simulate this