Could you give an example of your use case? As mentioned frequently in meta discussions, using more than two levels of categories is rarely the optimal solution. Usually, the same outcomes can be achieved through other means, such as tags.
To better understand your needs, I would like to ask:
Does every topic really belong to only one category? If not, tags might be more appropriate, since a topic can be assigned multiple tags, but not categories.
Are you looking to improve clarity, or are you also considering other factors, such as permissions or other rules? Categories can be set up with specific access levels, whereas tags cannot. As for clarity, they provide the same.
A category Called in Docs “Learning” under this Category I created “School Study Materials” as a subcategory and I need to create “Grades of Classes” under the Study Materials Subcategory.
Thank you. Just out of curiosity about category taxonomy, which is a topic for every new community, could you share your complete final category structure?
It would be interesting to think about all the other possible ways on how other people might structure it and what would be the benefits and downsides.
저는 토론과 메타 두 가지만 사용하고, 나머지는 모두 태그로 처리하게 할 것입니다. 하지만 제 사용자들은 그것이 너무 압도적일 것이라고 생각했습니다. 하지만 그것은 그들이 태그의 기능을 이해하기 전이었고, 인스타그램 해시태그의 다른 이름일 뿐이라는 것을 깨달았을 때의 일입니다.
이 우회로를 또 다른 이유로 표시하겠습니다. 이 종류의 문제는 이미 해결된 주제이므로, 더 #커뮤니티-빌딩에 가깝습니다.)