ملخص يومي للتعليقات

I checked the audit logs and it returned an empty response. I re-triggered the rule and it worked this time.

5 إعجابات

Hi,

Not sure where to report this or if it’s worth reporting, however, it seems that the Discourse AI summary feature hallucinates - quite a few times.

Example:
A topic was created, there were no replies nor interactions from users. No solutions were discussed nor investigated. See post.

Yet, the bot confidently states “Some options were discussed but no definitive solution.”

Is there no way to filter this so that if a post does not have replies, the summary is not imagined?

إعجاب واحد (1)

If you mean ‘can you get Bert to stop hallucinating’ then no, that is not something I can consistently do. :slight_smile:

I think the underlying tools get better all the time though, and accuracy improves along with them.

5 إعجابات

I do plan to eventually move to amalgamation of topic summaries for the topic summaries section

It can eliminate a bunch of problems, but increasing reliability here with the current tools will certainly increase cost a lot, you would need to generate and then run rounds of validation, could get very costly

إعجابَين (2)

On Daily Summary (5am UTC) - #149 by Discourse and Daily Summary (5am UTC) - #148 by Discourse, it seems that some topics have been spelt incorrectly. Instead of #site-feedback, it was #site feedback, hence the topic did not get the link. Then, instead of #dev:translations, it said #translations. Sinilarly, it entered #Self-hosting instead of #documentation:self-hosting.

Yes, this is a known thing. It’s not really worth the effort to manually edit them or spend a lot of time tweaking the prompt to work around it. :person_shrugging:

3 إعجابات

Bert has been eating the wrong mushrooms again

5 إعجابات

3 إعجابات

But… but you didn’t even post in that topic lol.
(Also, what Bert and mushrooms?)

Bert generally seems to be the nickname used for Meta’s AI bot.

إعجاب واحد (1)

Seems like this was fixed? AND formatted the same way as the original few posts? (For this one, but seems like the 1pm one has the caregories fixed, though it doesn’t look like the first few (where caregories are bolded))

We moved to Claude 3.5 Sonnet so the quality is a bit better.

3 إعجابات

Did AI just give up putting them (categories) in a class ‘mention’? Or was the prompt changed?

EDIT: Looks like it fixed itself in the next post.

It seems that AI did not group topics of the same category together, so the post has many many topics, with it in no apparent order.
(Not sure if this post belongs here)

Almost correct :slight_smile:

oh com’on. @Moin did the first one and the second topic was about something else lol

I’m flattered that bot thinks I’m doing Moin’s stuff tho. :laughing:

3 إعجابات

No feature request was made as one already exists. I just linked it. This was in support :grin:

إعجاب واحد (1)

I haven’t participated in that topic :dizzy_face:

إعجابَين (2)

oh now bot thinks I’m Hugh. :eyes: :woman_facepalming:t2:

3 إعجابات

It made a hugh mistake

5 إعجابات