Design choice behind /t, /c, and /users

What was the design choice behind going with abbreviated URIs for topics (/t), and categories (/c), but using the full form for accessing user pages (/users)?

2개의 좋아요

Because /users is a page on its own whereas /t and /c aren’t :wink:

5개의 좋아요

The average end user isn’t aware of that though, just seems inconsistent.

The average end user isn’t looking at the location bar.

12개의 좋아요

Shorter URLs, less desire to “localize” URLs since they are not full words.

3개의 좋아요

Probably also because users don’t create super long URLs while topics do. I’m glad to have a convention that keeps these a bit shorter.

2개의 좋아요

We need /u/ for /users/ :slight_smile:

6개의 좋아요

Agree, but we should open a specific topic to track this

4개의 좋아요

This is now the case and implemented as /u/

7개의 좋아요

I can confidently say that none of my users are paying attention to that, lol.

4개의 좋아요