Would you really use it in non-flipped form? The tertiary screen on the outside is kind of a different topic IMO.
Half-flipped though?
I dunno, half-flipped is like âcurved versus not curved monitorâ⌠does it really matter? Itâs aesthetics, isnât it?
Well, more than just aesthetics!
The same goes for the Galaxy Z Flip. Forbes said it best!
Curved monitors are unpleasant (subjective) when displaying primarily text and unsuited for it, they distort long runs of text and make it appear as though lines are not straight horizontally. How much of an impact it has is of course dependent on the radius of the curve.
The Galaxy Z Flip, in a half open state, I think is in an entirely separate category. Rather than affecting the text across the device, itâs only a line of text on the fold thatâs likely to be distorted and I donât think itâs unreasonable for something like Discourse to simply display as normal across the fold and let the user scroll as appropriate.
Iâm sure there are use cases but Iâm unclear as to why someone would want to use the phone in a half-open state, putting one or both halves of the display at a sub-optimal viewing angle. Playing Battleship opposite someone with another Z Flip?
I mostly agree in the context of handheld gaming devices and the Nintendo Switch not featuring that behaviour suggests Nintendo might agree too, though I do feel that the onus was more on the game developers to produce something that worked well across the two screens - which many failed to achieve - rather than the format being inherently flawed.
I do fully agree with the Wii U. Iâm not going to hold it in front of me the entire time I play, I would want to lower the controller to my lap but I would also want the information on that screen in my view.
I donât think that is a good comparison for devices like the Surface Duo, however. A closer comparison would be someone who uses a desktop computer with two displays - someone is unlikely to spread a single browser window across both because it will not provide a useful, cohesive experience.
That said, on a single display the master-detail view model is a very successful one prevalent across software in which navigation of a set list of sources is useful. Discourse could be a good candidate for that model irrespective of dual screen devices.
In a browser wide enough it might be a useful option to show the categories/latest/etc. view centred as it is, then shift to the left side and open a topic view on the right side when clicking on a topic - reversed for a RTL language.
My feelings are that dual screen mobile devices are not a meaningful development target for Discourse yet, if they ever will be. If the master-detail model was deemed worthwhile generally though, it would be good to keep them in mind while implementing it.
1 Mi Piace
You cannot be sure if the text will be distorted or not?
Take a look at this.
At the bare minimum, Discourse should be able to automatically adapt from the mobile view to the desktop view (and vice versa) depending on which display is being used.
Of course - I just meant the fold is the only place where it might be distorted while half open, so it probably doesnât need any attention for Discourse to work fine whether fully open or half open.
Presumably weâre talking about the Z Fold 3 here. I agree that it would ideally be able to switch between mobile and desktop layouts when it hits certain sizes, then switching between front and interior displays would naturally trigger that as the browser resizes. It appears that it currently just uses the browser user agent at the time the page loads to decide which to use.
1 Mi Piace
Due to the crease?
Responsive web design comes to mind.
1 Mi Piace
Yep, the sharp curve at the point where it folds. Text might be perfectly readable in that space, if that is the case then it further strengthens my opinion that Discourse doesnât need to treat that and similar devices any differently whether half or fully open.
Devices like the Z Fold 3, as you reference, could be dealt with by general purpose responsiveness. I donât believe that this is really a bare minimum requirement though - the mobile view in a wider space is not perfect but itâs functional.
The user might benefit from it switching to the desktop view when opening the device to the interior display but they can still do everything with the mobile view. If itâs a significant amount of work to support mobile<->desktop responsiveness, it may not be worthwhile doing that for a minority on foldables who already have an entirely functional experience.
1 Mi Piace
The crease isnât noticeable from normal viewing angles.
The mobile view is spaced out too much on larger devices. Thereâs a bit of wasted space.
Check this out: https://www.quora.com/How-much-longer-does-it-take-to-produce-a-responsive-design-for-a-website-on-average
Are you able to take any screenshots with the default Discourse theme?
1 Mi Piace
Nice graphical summary.
I have to say, whilst foldables and âduosâ (how much?!) might be a tiny market, I really like the master, detail concept which presumably would be Topic List, Topic for Discourse. An architecture which facilitated that would be really nice 
1 Mi Piace
Samsung is focusing all in on foldable devices now.
Ho preso un Surface Duo economico per $390 con tasse e spedizione, ed è aggiornabile ad Android 11, quindi ci proverò.
(Ora câè un Surface Duo 2, quindi questo è il modello precedente.)
4 Mi Piace
Microsoft non ha reso disponibile Android 11 per Surface Duo fino a pochissimo tempo fa. Ho dovuto restituire il mio perchĂŠ era un pasticcio pieno di bug. Android 11 non sembrava aiutare (e chiaramente non sono lâunico a pensarla cosĂŹ).
Da quello che ho sentito, lâesperienza è molto migliore su Surface Duo 2, ma spero che la tua esperienza con esso sia stata almeno discreta finora? Quanto funziona bene con Discourse?
Non lo so, non ce lâho ancora.
Ah, okay. Quando lo riceverai?
1 Mi Piace
Ce lâho adesso. Un affare piuttosto grande per $350, un punteggio Speedometer 2.0 di circa 47, che lo pone al livello di prestazioni di un iPhone 7 del 2016. Divertente da usare a quel prezzo, ma câè una cucitura gigante tra i due schermi.
Anche da aperto non è abbastanza grande per essere un vero tablet, quindi mi sembra un poâ una terra di nessunoâŚ?
2 Mi Piace
Ă utile?