I’m not sure that AI is my case. I collect data from different sources and the main idea is to find really important highlights (words, urls, proofs etc) and create a structured data which could answer these questions:
- What was the proper order on the way of accepting the certain solution related to the some task. In order to reconstruct the actual picture of events.
- The algorithm should detect important mentions in a tons of poor-quality conversations (especially email with many levels of attachments and non-trusted web publications)
- Define valuable links between different actions, approximately such way: news → blog → public mood and needs → chat/email decision → used strategy → real actions → approved assumptions → related persons → explaination the result
So I use some python template for this:
PRODUCT_RELATIVE_SOURCES = {
"websites": {
"company1": [
"blog",
"vacancies",
"news",
"tags"
]
},
"social-networks": {
"network1": [
"feed",
"story",
"public",
"direct",
"tags"
]
},
"messengers": {
"messenger1": [
"chat1",
"room1",
"bot1",
"direct",
"tags"
]
}
"mailboxes": {
"box1": [
"subject",
"body",
"sender",
"cc",
"meta"
]
}
}
EXCLUDE_SOURCES = {
"main",
"libs",
"opt"
}
Probably I wonder to have similar data structure exported from Discourse (through API maybe). Initially I asked the question concerning Discourse for Teams, because I found many similar with Slack and our team is not satisfied with Slack. Payable function of history is almost useless.