Hi. I need to better understand what this will mean come next June. I haven’t touched IE in many years, but I do have a significant number of users who do use it on older computers, and these are not users in a position to easily change browsers or buy new computers! I need to know what “dropping support” means for those users, who I cannot leave out in the cold! Thanks.

We are still discussing the details of it, and will release our official plan in mid January.

Thanks. There are still many users trapped in IE without recourse, and these are often users with minimal computer skills on old computers that they cannot afford to replace, and who would not be able to easily switch to another browser (which is usually why they’re still on IE now!). Also, these are often users in demographics that are already disenfranchised in other ways, and who depend on their old computers and the forums they use to not be further isolated.

Support will be dropped for Internet Explorer not for old PCs. As far as I know, Firefox is available everywhere Internet Explorer 11 is.

You’re missing the point. These are users who cannot easily switch to and learn new browsers. They would have switched long ago if they could have. I take it you don’t support any special needs users yourself, right? No friends or family with special needs far away stuck on old computers with old browsers and no way to upgrade them? Many of these users took ages just to get IE configured so that it was minimally readable for them. Even computer literate users can have problems switching to Firefox. Ceasing to have even minimal support for IE is kicking these already disadvantaged users in the teeth, and will not be a PR boost for Discourse when it becomes widely known. And I’ll add, saying “just switch to Firefox” suggests that you don’t have a clue about what is involved in supporting this category of already disadvantaged users.

Are these users of a forum you’re maintaining, or is this theoretical? Feedback about how we could minimize disruption due to the depreciation is always welcome. Outside of a few exceptions that are on legacy enterprise systems, within our hosting purview we see about 1% overall IE11 usage. Discourse as open-source software wouldn’t exist without our hosting side of the business, and what it more or less boils down to is a business decision. Does it make sense for us to expend 10%+ of our development resources to support a constantly declining 1% of our users? Does it make sense to limit our engineering team (which also impacts hiring prospects)? Does it make sense to leave other Discourse users (~99% of our customers’ users) with worse performance and possible security vulnerabilities because we’re supporting a very outdated browser? (Note that the cybersecurity exec at Microsoft has advised against using IE11 Microsoft security chief: IE is not a browser, so stop using it as your default | ZDNET) Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner where they assured their corporate partners that Windows 10 won’t break their legacy applications, which has elevated IE11 to be near-eternal… are Microsoft’s corporate customers’ legacy applications a good reason to limit Discourse? IE usage is also dropping very rapidly among users that rely on screen readers and based on the current trends will be less than 10% by 2020 (WebAIM: Screen Reader User Survey #8 Results). Discourse set out with the mission to modernize communities on the web. Are we achieving that goal when we hold the majority of users back because 1% can’t/won’t upgrade? It might be a hard change to make for some users with limited skills, resources, or abilities… but as far as IE goes the change is inevitable. Will this small subset of users be more capable 5 years from now?

Hi. Let me back up a moment and address the general form issue (though I’ll say now that this is not theoretical, I don’t run a large forum myself but I care about the users who are still stuck on IE, who tend to have either low computer literacy, be extremely elderly (but still very active!) or both. When I say elderly, I mean in the 80s, 90s, approaching 100! And they still make great posts and care. I don’t want to kick them out when I know they will never upgrade their systems. There are still people running Windows Me! Windows Vista! You get the drift. Scary from a security standpoint? Definitely. But that’s the reality. I am always concerned when I see marginalized populations expressed in term of percentages. I’ve criticized various large platforms regarding this kind of issue for many years when it comes to various UI decisions. Those tiny percentages can still represent significant numbers of warm bodies. Will they all be around (or alive?) in 5 years? I dunno. That’s the wrong question, I believe. I’m more concerned about quality of life now. Obviously, one doesn’t expect all the features of a forum to be available forever to people running old systems and old browsers. However, I would assert that providing continued access to basic functionalities is important (note, for example, how even today Gmail has a greatly simplified “basic HTML mode” available). Ultimately, I would request that the team think less about the percentages and more about the actual human beings. You can safely assume that anyone still stuck on IE has reasons for being in that position, likely beyond their practical ability to alter at this point. They’re usually already disadvantaged and cut off from most of the world. It is very disturbing to me when I see technical decisions being made that marginalize them as “unimportant” even further. Thanks very much for your consideration. Lauren Weinstein Lauren Weinstein's Blog

I understand where you’re coming from, and appreciate that you’re looking out. We just need to draw a line somewhere unfortunately. It is possible that we could serve our no-JS/web-crawler view to users on unsupported browsers; at the very least that would grant them the ability to access the community’s content. As mentioned earlier our plans aren’t 100% complete yet, so there are more details to work out.

Thanks very much. Please let me know if my input can be of any use during this process.

Lauren as someone Disabled myself I feel very strongly about your core message. I also have two elderly parents who are still “in the game” with iPhones and a Win10 computer and I spend a lot of time working with them on how text messages and email are not the same thing, etc. My point is meant to be re-assuring and I hope it comes across that way - in my experience after a long It career, if your “customers” (I am not sure what word to use - community?) are using old versions of IE on old versions of windows, well then they are in effect already suffering under the maximum load of bugs, lack of functionality and features - this Jan change wont affect them at all. They already do not havew the bells and whistles of win10 and IE with Silverlight etc etc and so are, in effect, the MOST prepared for a stoppage of new bells and whistles for IE 11. (I do not work in any way for Discourse, just a random IT career guy) I hope that makes you a little more at ease. I also salute the dev team for not putting up a scary message forcing people to migrate to a new browser, or things along those lines, just quietly focusing on other areas. matt

Fim do suporte ao Internet Explorer

Suporte ao Produto

jomaxro (Joshua Rosenfeld) 7 Janeiro , 2020 17:42 21

O anúncio oficial já está disponível.

Tópico		Respostas	Vistas
Discourse is ending support for Internet Explorer 11 (IE11) on June 1, 2020 Announcements	5	8724	14 Junho , 2022
How long will Discourse support the old Microsoft Edge? Development	15	1276	12 Novembro , 2019
Dropping iOS 15 & other old browsers in July 2025 Announcements	143	65994	21 Agosto , 2025
Discourse will be dropping IE9 support in 2016 Feature rfc	14	6989	3 Janeiro , 2016
Backwards compatibility with older browsers Product Support	48	5124	4 Março , 2023

Fim do suporte ao Internet Explorer

Related topics