Ever thought about switching from Markdown to Mediawiki syntax?

贡献 功能
1

Mediawiki syntax is incredibly easy to use and kind of genius. It would also work well with wiki posts. It also seems to be more familiar to non-developers than Markdown but I could be very wrong.

Examples:

==header==
===subheader===
====sub-subheader====

*bullet point without needing space

‘’‘bold’’’

‘‘italics’’

[[File:easyfilereferencing.png]]

[[File:easyfileformatting.png|300x300px|right|caption]]

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting

2

Discourse is heavily invested in Markdown, as @codinghorror even went to co-build https://commonmark.org/ to develop a markdown standard.

7 个赞
3

ah ok. np ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

4

I wonder if it would even be legal to sell something with mediawiki syntax, I assume so though

5

@orchardstreet，这是合法的。MediaWiki 是 FOSS（自由及开源软件），没有任何实体为任何标记语法申请了专利。