GitHub onebox does not skip leading tabs

Contribute Feature
1

An incorrect rendering (the code uses tabs):

A correct rendering (the code uses spaces):

3개의 좋아요
2

I don’t understand why this is a bug. The file contains tabs… so it is displaying tabs. Discourse isn’t adding any additional tabs, it is still displaying 4 of them.

Are you saying the onebox should replace tabs with spaces? As why should a onebox alter content of the file it is referencing?

3

The Github onebox strips leading spaces, but not tabs.

5개의 좋아요
4

If that’s the case then we might extend this to tabs as well for consistency so @dmitry_fedyuk has a point.

3개의 좋아요
5

Ah, so that seems to be as simple as changing (and its other usage ^[ ]{#{min_space}})
^[ ]*

to
^[\s]*

4개의 좋아요
6

There are two lines these change would need to be made on:

  m = l.match /^[ ]*/ # find leading spaces 0 or more

and

  re = Regexp.new "^[ ]{#{min_space}}"  #match the minimum spaces of the line

Please be specific about white spacing (i.e. use [ \t]), using \s may cause unicode white-space ghosts past, present and future to come back and kick your ass.

3개의 좋아요
7

Actually, I don’t think that is a concern, if Ruby’s regex uses PCRE, it only matches a subset of values unless it is specifically compiled in a way that can put a strain on performance using the PCRE_UCP option.
http://www.pcre.org/pcre.txt

Plus that non-whitespace would have to be at the start of a line, which is unlikely too, granted, I guess someone could write a literal string across multiple lines.

Fairly certain \s is safe, but I also have nothing against specifying \t. Another approach would be to replace all instances of \t at the beginning of a line with 4 spaces and let the logic continue on its way since it already works with spaces.

So I’d say there is a very very small chance that \s would be problematic. Especially given that it would have to be a multi-line literal string. Otherwise, there would be zero chance of it the line starting with a unicode whitespace.