Try putting this into Google: site:forum.hearingtracker.com/t/costco-kirkland-signature-9-0-product-information/45380 Here’s the results you will see (48 results for a single page): [image] This is a duplicate content bug, and should be considered an urgent SEO issue for the Discourse platform …

[Bild] abrambailey: So, I guess the rationale here is that long threads are paginated, but since this is a lazy-loading SPA, the canonicals are behaving as if traditional pagination is happening. I’m honestly not sure what the rationale is for doing it this way. This is wrong. For crawlers, …

[Bild] Falco: For crawlers, Discourse uses 20 posts longs pages, so every single post can be crawled just fine. There is no SPA for bots. Sorry, SPA may be the wrong term, I just meant that a Discourse thread kind of behaves like a single page app in the sense that pagination is happening dyn…

How would that be better for the forum’s human visitors? Do you not think some might become confused if they think they’re going to eg. “page 2” and land on an area of “the only page”? Might they look in vain for pagination navigation that isn’t there?

I’d rather have more confused visitors than less traffic from Google. Duplicate content is a real SEO problem, and the “loves” on your comment by two Discourse team members is seriously perplexing.

[Bild] abrambailey: Duplicate content is a real SEO problem I am not sure I’d think it serious enough to call it “a real SEO problem”. AFAIK, what happens without rel="canonical" is the search engines decide which result URL best matches the search instead of what a site might prefer to be th…

I think you may have skipped over the image I posted above… Here’s the text: John Mueller commented , “We don’t treat pagination differently. We treat them as normal pages.” Meaning paginated pages are not recognized by Google as a series of pages consolidated into one piece of content as they pre…

[Bild] abrambailey: skipped over the image Ah, thanks, I did miss that the concern isn’t about duplicate content but rather duplicate title and meta description warnings. For Discourse at least, those are more like “notices” than warnings. Kind of like “if you didn’t know about this you shou…

Google indiziert dieselbe Seite mehrfach: Problem mit Canonicals

Unterstützung

Mittineague (Mittineague) 18. Oktober 2019 um 17:36 4

Wie wäre das besser für die menschlichen Besucher des Forums? Meinen Sie nicht, einige könnten verwirrt werden, wenn sie denken, sie würden z. B. auf „Seite 2

Thema		Antworten	Aufrufe
Adding Canonical Redirects for SEO Optimization Support	23	7667	1. Oktober 2015
?page= sometimes redirects to a page with a different canonical URL Bug	2	788	19. Oktober 2020
Removing the /2, /3, /4, etc links for each reply within a topic URL Development seo	33	4650	13. Oktober 2024
Negative SEO because of too much category pages getting indexed Support	8	1824	3. Juli 2017
Canonical tag not reset after client-side redirect from crawler ?page=N to /t/slug/id/<post_number> Bug seo	0	58	14. September 2026

Google indiziert dieselbe Seite mehrfach: Problem mit Canonicals

Verwandte Themen