Hi, I came across an option to use silent editing for post titles and also body of posts that is only visible to staff. Currently, when anyone, poster or moderator, makes an edit it can be seen in the revision history. However, there may be times when staff want to edit something, for example remove personally identifiable information in a post without it showing in the revision history. Another example, might be spelling or grammar. I am talking about light fixes without drawing attention to it. Is there such an option and where/how do we enable it? One of the admins sent me this image: [The image displays a set of configurable options for a post management interface, including controls for edit history visibility, fast edit functionality, and reply suppression in the reply count of posts. (Captioned by AI)] Is this the right place to change it? We are currently on Discourse 3.3.0 Thanks in advance for any assistance.

[imagem] Rubi: We are currently on Discourse 3.3.0 Just a gentle nudge to update and benefit from all the new features as well as crucial security updates. :slight_smile: [imagem] Rubi: However, there may be times when staff want to edit something, for example remove personally identifiable information in a post without it showing in the revision history. Another example, might be spelling or grammar. I am talking about light fixes without drawing attention to it. For this, I’d separate those example into two distinct pots and handle them differently. The short answer is that there isn’t really a ‘silent edit’ function as such. When you edit a post a notification is sent to the person whose post it is even if you hide the revision. The ‘hide revision’ option Nate is referring to is in the post revision modal (the edit history) and can only be applied after the edit has been made: [The image shows a screen capture of a Slack history page with a timestamp stating '17 mins,' an editable topic titled 'Topic to test post revisions,' and two red buttons labeled 'Revert' and 'Hide revised post.' (Captioned by AI)] If you hide a revision then non-staff will not be able to see that part of the edit history and the edit count for them will also be reduced by 1 as well. However, from a UX perspective, the user will receive a notification saying there’s been an edit, but when they click on it to go to the post/edit history it will tell them they don’t have access to see it. For typos and whatnot I tend to use the edit info box to add some extra detail on why I edited (if it’s not obvious, or if it’s a user that may not be familiar with the community’s approach to edits). It’s a little tucked away but you can find it here: [The image shows a text revision interface for editing a post titled 'Topic to test post revisions' with the name 'Test_Two' and the ability to add an optional tag. (Captioned by AI)] Clicking on the :information_source: brings up an input box where you can type your edit reason, and this will be displayed in the edit history for added context. [The screenshot shows a GitHub issue page where a user named jammydodger created a new topic with the title 'Topic to test post revisions' and tagged 'Corrected typos', with various revision options near the bottom. (Captioned by AI)] So I would tend to leave those edits visible. Most people don’t mind a typo tweak and would understand why an edit had been made. For the removal of PII I would actually go one step further than hiding the revision (as well as sending a PM to the user telling them I’d removed sensitive information). There’s a hidden site setting that allows posts and post revisions to be permanently deleted rather than soft-deleted (that is ‘removed completely’ v ‘hidden from non-staff’). Depending on your hosting, you can enable that feature from the rails console Enable setting to allow admins to permanently delete data (and if hosted then you would need to request it be turned on from your hosting provider). Permanently deleting posts is an admin-only function, though deleting post revisions can be done by moderators. When you hide a post revision an extra option turns up for ‘delete revisions’. This will completely wipe the edit history for that post. [imagem] Rubi: Would we find it here? Admin > Settings > Posting hide_post_revision_controls – should be disabled so staff can use this enable_post_edit_tracking – must be enabled to track and show/hide edit history I am not familiar with these? Where did you find that info?

I don’t think so. IIRC that globally affects all edits. Instead, the staff member can hide the edit in the edit popup.

[imagem] NateDhaliwal: the staff member can hide the edit in the edit popup. That’s the problem, we do not see that. Could it be a theme-related issue? Or a setting to configure the options in the editor?

Would we find it here? Admin > Settings > Posting hide_post_revision_controls – should be disabled so staff can use this enable_post_edit_tracking – must be enabled to track and show/hide edit history

[imagem] JammyDodger: Just a gentle nudge to update and benefit from all the new features as well as crucial security updates Yes, I know :slightly_smiling_face: I spoke to one of the site admins about this. Regarding hiding revisions: now I understand this, thanks. [imagem] Rubi: hide_post_revision_controls – should be disabled so staff can use this enable_post_edit_tracking – must be enabled to track and show/hide edit history Are you saying these do not exist or that I have misunderstood their purpose?

[imagem] Rubi: Are you saying these do not exist or that I have misunderstood their purpose? I don’t recognise them. :thinking: I can’t find them in an admin search, and a meta search for either only brings up your post. If you give me some extra context about where you see them it might fire a neuron. :crossed_fingers:

I think it is my misunderstanding of the context from here: [imagem] Ability to hide or delete old revisions on selected posts Feature Continuing the discussion from Allow feature to hide edit history for mods: While this currently exists as a site setting, it’d be nice if it could be done selectively, just on posts that need this protection. Specifically, from the PR that is mentioned.

@JammyDodger I’ve marked your post as the solution since it answered my main question as to whether or not a silent edit feature exists. I will encourage the other mods to use the :information_source: field to add editing reasons. Thanks again for all the helpful responses.

Como ativar a edição silenciosa para moderadores

Suporte ao Produto

Rubi 7 Junho , 2025 08:55 8

Acho que é um mal-entendido meu do contexto daqui:

Especificamente, do PR que é mencionado.

Tópico		Respostas	Vistas
Ability to hide or delete old revisions on selected posts Feature completed	3	3925	14 Outubro , 2014
Why post revisions cannot be disabled for admins? Product Support	5	800	10 Junho , 2023
Is it possible to hide editing history from users? Product Support	2	188	15 Março , 2025
Is it possible to automatically hide revisions of topic that are made by mods/admins? Product Support	2	640	17 Agosto , 2022
Admin Editing user posts without showing the edit mark Product Support	4	284	28 Julho , 2024

Como ativar a edição silenciosa para moderadores

Related topics