How to Run the Best Comment Section on the Web: A Playbook for Publishers

AI 生成的摘要

The discussion revolves around a Discourse blog post outlining how publishers can create high-quality comment sections using Discourse. The playbook highlights key strategies, including using AI to screen new commenters for spam and toxicity, translating threads into multiple languages, keeping readers on the article page, assigning permanent threads to each article, and empowering regular users to assist with moderation. Setup instructions are provided for WordPress, Ghost, and other JavaScript-capable sites.

A significant portion of the thread focuses on the statement that “our engineers can move your old comments over for you.” stromfeldt asks for clarification on whether this refers to internal moves or imports from external platforms like Substack or WordPress. mcwumbly confirms that Discourse performs migrations from various publishing platforms and commenting systems, suggesting the official page be updated to list supported sources.

stromfeldt expresses enthusiasm for this service, planning to migrate colleagues’ publications to a shared Discourse instance, and hopes that support for platforms like Blogger is available. In response, mcwumbly explains that while open-source migration scripts exist, they require manual effort and often follow an “80% rule” where most data transfers easily but fine-grained decisions take more time. He notes that the team has developed many bespoke tools that are not yet fully productized but are working to integrate more capabilities into the open-source tooling.

What if your comment section was the best part of your website?

Your commenters are your most valuable readers. They read to the very end, debate your writers, and keep coming back for more. When publishers give these readers a premium space to connect, they increase time on site, boost organic search traffic, and build a loyal, owned community.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://blog.discourse.org/2026/10/how-to-run-the-best-comment-section-on-the-web-a-playbook-for-publishers/
4 个赞

此外,我们的工程师可以帮您迁移旧评论。

这具体是什么意思?是指可以在 Discourse 实例内部移动评论,还是指 Discourse 的工程师能够以某种方式从其他发布平台(如 Substack、WordPress、Blogger 等)导入评论?

正是如此。我们经常帮助客户从其他社区平台迁移到 Discourse。我们也完成过许多迁移项目,帮助用户将评论从各种发布平台(以及其他评论系统)转移到 Discourse。也许我们需要更新此页面以列出其中一些:Migrating to Discourse | Discourse - Civilized Discussion

1 个赞

哇,好的,听到这个真是太棒了!我肯定会联系 Discourse 团队讨论此事。希望在未来几个月内,当我开始将一些同事从各个发布平台迁移到他们自己的 Ghost 出版物时(所有这些都将统一在一个 Discourse 实例下用于评论功能),能顺利推进。

这确实可能很有用。虽然我会假设 Substack 和 WordPress 是强有力的候选者,而 Ko-Fi 则不是,但我还是希望能抱有一丝希望,认为 Blogger 也可能是可行的。

2 个赞

听起来不错!请注意,我们早就在开源仓库中包含了迁移脚本,但要完成这项工作确实需要付出不少努力,而且“80/20 法则”同样适用于数据迁移。前 80% 的工作量只需要花费 20% 的精力。对某些人来说,这可能已经足够了。但对于另一些人来说,我们会不遗余力地针对其特定的迁移场景进行迭代优化,帮助人们就移动哪些内容以及将其移动到何处做出精细化的决策,但这也是有成本的。

多年来,我们的迁移团队开发了许多定制工具,但我们_尚未_能完全将它们产品化。不过,我们也一直在努力尽可能多的功能整合到我们的开源工具中,以便其他人也能开展类似的工作。

只是发现模式需要时间,而且并非所有内容都能轻松通用化。

1 个赞