User onebox is a bit thin on data per:
We should improve it so it has some more data from the user card.
User onebox is a bit thin on data per:
We should improve it so it has some more data from the user card.
I have been looking at this. Improving user onebox would require creating a custom template for it, correct?
Hmm it is not terrible now, but I guess there are some improvements like possibly emulating a bit of:
Posted, Joined, Read, Location all seem reasonable for the card.
You would need a custom template, yes.
@codinghorror what do you think here?
Oh I see yes sure the user onebox is pretty weak. Totally fine go for it.
Also doesn’t seem to work for all of my users. Example:
https://se23.life/users/Helen_Thomson
https://se23.life/users/BovillDan
… but does work for me
https://se23.life/users/ChrisBeach
Is this another problem where there’s no description and Onebox fails to render anything?
That would be my guess, yes.
In theory we could have the onebox description here be synthesized from the user activity or something. "member since: 2017-1, 22 posts, last posted yesterday, avid reader"
The biggest omission there is that it’s not prioritizing “long name” which I think is correct for public shares. It should be “Chris Beach” in the public onebox, weird that the username is there.
This is how it looks like with my changes. Thoughts?
I wonder if it’s really ok to include “posted” and “read recently” since it’s going to be out of date pretty soon after it’s baked?
Looks good!
Yeah, great point, we try to avoid highly time-specific data in oneboxes as they are typically baked only at the time of posting. Perhaps some other stats would be less time dependent here? Join date seems safe enough at least.
I have added a PR add a custom user onebox by majakomel · Pull Request #5542 · discourse/discourse · GitHub, slightly different than the screenshot above, without the time specific stats. Other stats that could be relevant (like created posts/topic count) are also changing fast, so I haven’t included them.
This looks excellent to me! Thanks @maja
방금 다시 이 내용을 보고 간단히 테스트를 해봤는데, 사용자 프로필 원박스(onebox)는 여전히 꽤 괜찮아 보입니다. 다만 커뮤니티에서 이 기능이 얼마나 많이 사용될지는 잘 모르겠네요. 개인적으로는 요즘에는 그냥 @로 사용자를 언급하고, 사용자가 사용자명을 클릭하면 더 정보량이 많고 실용적인 사용자 카드가 뜨는 방식이 훨씬 마음에 듭니다.
네, 제 생각에는 이 기능 요청을 닫아도 될 것 같습니다 ![]()
이 주제는 3일 후 자동으로 닫혔습니다. 더 이상 새로운 답변이 허용되지 않습니다.