C'è ancora un caso d'uso per la casella "Crittografa PM se disponibile" nelle opzioni dello script di automazione?

zogstrip · 6 Gennaio 2026, 10:32am

Ottima osservazione @Moin

github.com/discourse/discourse

DEV: Remove defunct "Encrypts PM if available" option from automation

main ← remove-prefers-encrypt-from-automation

opened 10:32AM - 06 Jan 26 UTC

ZogStriP

+68 -156

The "Encrypts PM if available" checkbox in automation script options was a lefto…ver from the discourse-encrypt plugin, which was archived almost a year ago. Since `EncryptedPostCreator` no longer exists, the option had no effect - the code always fell back to using the regular `PostCreator`. This removes all traces of the `prefers_encrypt` feature: - The checkbox UI in the PM field component - The `prefers_encrypt` parameter from `Utils.send_pm` - References in send_pms and gift_exchange scripts - The column from the pending_pms table (via post-deploy migration) - Associated translations and tests The column removal follows the standard two-phase approach: first declaring `ignored_columns` in the model, then dropping the column in a post-deploy migration. Ref - https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/392664

Argomento		Risposte	Visualizzazioni
Automation not respecting encrypt/not encrypt for auto-pms Bug encrypt , automation , size-s	3	510	Aprile 15, 2023
Discourse Encrypt (deprecated) Plugin official , encrypt , end-of-life	13	22320	Settembre 22, 2025
Do not show topics and PMs to admins unless they are participants Feature feedback	10	275	Febbraio 6, 2025
Forcing encrypted personal messages Support encrypt	2	503	Agosto 22, 2022
Discourse bcc is not compatible with Encrypt Bug encrypt , bcc	7	743	Dicembre 23, 2024

C'è ancora un caso d'uso per la casella "Crittografa PM se disponibile" nelle opzioni dello script di automazione?

Argomenti correlati