Let’s Encrypt problem after upgrading to 1.9.0.beta3

After upgrading to 1.9.0.beta3 , the SSL(Let’s Encrypt) rating has changed from A+ to A,the problem is HSTS.

Thanks very much

1개의 좋아요

What is the problem with HSTS?

Using the ssllabs.com query, HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with long duration deployed on this server this sentence disappears . Thank you.

The default HSTS configuration is compliant with the SSL Labs recommendations. What site are you testing, and what changes have you made to the default discourse_docker templates?

I have nothing to change, completely default. My website is https://www.xxxx.com/

Your site is not sending an HSTS header at all. You’re also sending a header that was reverted from the default template nine days ago. Whatever you’re doing over there, it isn’t what we recommend.

4개의 좋아요

Working fine on my self hosted by the book install of Discourse

3개의 좋아요

Hmm, plausible, as I did a command line rebuild yesterday cc @falco.

1개의 좋아요

Can confirm discourse.codinghorror.com is no longer sending a HSTS header at all:

$ wget -O /dev/null -S https://discourse.codinghorror.com -q
  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  Server: nginx
  Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:04:15 GMT
  Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
  Transfer-Encoding: chunked
  Connection: keep-alive
  Vary: Accept-Encoding
  X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
  X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
  X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
  X-Discourse-Route: list/latest
  Cache-Control: no-store, must-revalidate, no-cache, private
  X-Discourse-Cached: true
  X-Request-Id: f40d4ea9-375a-4a9e-b6e1-c7500ffa194f
  X-Runtime: 0.002585
  X-Discourse-TrackView: 1
  Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade
2개의 좋아요

Yeah, I made a mistake when I added the Referrer-Policy header.

nginx add_header lack of support for inheritance got me there.

Will fix soon.

9개의 좋아요

Awwwwwwww yeah… we’ve all been to that circle of hell.

6개의 좋아요

Rebuild a site to test this in action:

https://github.com/discourse/discourse_docker/commit/42504d319c1c7abe8501e8db4efcf1707aaaa240

6개의 좋아요

It works!

Thanks for the report @saluzi this was a definite regression.

8개의 좋아요