검색에서 #documentation을 더 눈에 띄게 만들기

이것이 새 주제로 만들어져야 하는지, 아니면 검색에 관한 것인지(관련 주제가 있긴 한데 찾을 수가 없습니다) 잘 모르겠습니다. 누군가 슬로우 모드(slow mode)가 무엇인지 물어보았습니다. 검색해 보았지만 찾을 수 없었습니다. (지난 7년간 Contribute > Feature 관련 주제를 모두 읽었기 때문에, 실제로 한 번도 본 적은 없지만 슬로우 모드가 무엇인지는 알고 있습니다).

“slow mode” 로 검색하면 https://meta.discourse.org/t/slow-mode-appreciation/219373를 찾을 수 있는데, 여기에는 답이 있을 수도 있습니다.

설정을 "slow mode"로 검색하면 "'Slow Mode’는 editing_grace_period 이후 편집을 방지합니까?"라는 항목이 나오지만, 여전히 슬로우 모드가 무엇인지 알 수 있는 방법은 없습니다.

몇 번의 시도는 "slow database"에 대한 주제를 가져오는 것 같았는데, 이게 좋을까요.

관련해서, #how-to나 #announcements의 검색 우선순위를 높여야 할까요?

7개의 좋아요

hmm i got this topic as one of my search results for slow mode but it wasn’t near the top of the list:

2개의 좋아요

I may have been too impatient. :slight_smile:

But also, @JammyDodger , slow mode may deserve its own topic. It may be that it’s not search’s fault that it didn’t find a good answer (though yours was quite good for the person who asked).

2개의 좋아요

just to be clear, i had to click “more” to get the full page of results and scroll to get that. it wasn’t on the immediate popup list of results. :slightly_smiling_face:

2개의 좋아요

그 전에 이미 하나 아직 그런 것이 없다고 생각한다는 답변을 시작했는데, 내가 하나를 작성하겠다고 자원하는 것처럼 들리지 않으면서도 그 뜻을 전할 말을 좀처럼 찾지 못했습니다… :slight_smile:

하지만 아니요, 하나를 가지는 것이 좋을 것 같습니다. :+1: 제 목록에 추가하겠습니다. :memo:

Support 가 'low’로 설정되어 있으면 나머지는 자동으로 우선순위가 올라가므로, 이것이 필요하지 않을 수도 있습니다. :thinking: 이미 존재하는 것을 검색하면 더 좋은 결과가 나올지 궁금합니다.

즉각적인 업데이트: 아니요, 그렇지 않습니다. :slight_smile: 'invites’와 'whispers’를 검색해 보았는데 #documentation보다 Contribute > FeatureContribute > Bug 주제들이 더 많이 나왔습니다. 이 부분을 조금 조정해 보고 차이가 나는지 확인해 보겠습니다.

4개의 좋아요

The Documentation subcategories were all set to ‘high’ already. I cranked them up to ‘very high’, and it did give them a lot more prominence in the results, but I think it may have been too much as it did drown out a lot of pretty much anything else. I’ve knocked them back down to ‘high’ again (at least for now).

I think adding in:docs or #documentation to the search is useful, but does rely on people knowing about them (and remembering to use them). Searching the Documentation - Discourse Meta list is good too, and possibly easier to find for new people?

5개의 좋아요

Ohh. Yes. Documentation - Discourse Meta is definitely where new people should look. I think it would be good if that were more prominently available on the sidebar. Right now (as far as I can tell) you need to click the “more” and then find the docs link. It seems far from obvious. (And now I’ve hijacked this topic, with stuff that doesn’t belong, it seems).

2개의 좋아요

The current bumping appears to be working correctly though?

I had a quick run-through with ‘invites’, ‘whispers’, and ‘polls’ (so just a rough ‘off-the-top-of-my-head’ attempt) and the Documentation wasn’t the first thing that came up.

in:docs works a treat though.

2개의 좋아요

oh my … you found an edge case here…

Title: invite something invite

Will win in search over a prioritized category with

Title: invite only once


This is because: SiteSetting.max_duplicate_search_index_terms is set to 6… This is kind of fine for topic body, but for titles… I think we want the simple 1.

Fixed this per:

https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/21464

Will issue a full reindex on meta once this lands.

9개의 좋아요

We have success!

How is search feeling now @JammyDodger ?

7개의 좋아요

That is working excellently. :clap: I’ve tried to trick it with lots of things, but so far it’s been giving me docs at the top every time. :+1:

6개의 좋아요

There is 1 tiny edge case on poll I feel there is a vector for tricking my new intelligence there, but except for that I agree, looking great.

Will see if we can make a few more improvements to search to justify bumping the index globally, it requires a full rebake to take effect. Going to bookmark this for 1 month from now.

7개의 좋아요

I wonder if using tags to improve the ranking of search results (adding rating modifiers to tags) would allow further fine-tuning.

1개의 좋아요