Non-existent @'ed users get bolded

Not sure if this was intentional, so I figured I’d bring it up. If you @ a non-existent user, the text is still bolded, though it doesn’t have the background and it’s not clickable. Obviously it doesn’t really matter, but :man_shrugging:

Without @:
NotARealUser

With @:
@NotARealUser

5개의 좋아요

Side effect of the recent “not mentionable” change @eviltrout? It is true the user isn’t mentionable, but that’s because they don’t exist…

5개의 좋아요

That is actually good for using as an example when teaching someone how to mention users - without actually pinging a real user. :slightly_smiling_face:

I’d probably use a code block for that @JimPas.

3개의 좋아요

Why? Bold makes it visually distinct automatically, without knowing or needing to use additional markdown.

That’s like using a saw to open a can with a ring pull.

1개의 좋아요

That’s true, but the best example to teach someone how mention works is precisely mentioning this person itself, right? So they even see how they’re notified about it.

I also often use code block when I have to “teach” a feature without triggering it though.

6개의 좋아요

This is definitely the recommended approach

This is definitely the `recommended` approach
1개의 좋아요