We don’t seem to have a live library of Data Explorer queries here on meta.discourse.org at the moment. Would this be worthwhile addressing?
The topic referred to here is unstructured and has been closed as it was a mess:
@SidV has set up a great collection in GitHub:
discourse-data-explorer/querys.md at queries · SidVal/discourse-data-explorer · GitHub
Is the time right for a community managed library here on Meta? I think that many would find it useful.
Yes, that topic got so many questions and responses that it became unreadable.
I think so. Does anyone have ideas about the best way to organize Data Explorer queries on this site? Ideally it would be possible to find existing queries by searching for a few keywords.
A few thoughts:
data-explorer-query tag for individual topics. These topics could reside at #howto:tips-and-tricksThanks for having me present 
I’m open to changing the classification of the queries list on GitHub, maybe if we all think about a classification there, we can after debugging the categories well, go to something here in Meta (?).
Feel free to submit a PR
각 쿼리를 PR하거나 포크하는 등 다양한 작업을 할 수 있다는 사실을 몰랐습니다. 꽤 멋진 기능이고, 그렇게 한 이유를 이해할 수 있습니다. 하지만 기술에 익숙하지 않은 사람들에게는 혼란을 줄 수 있는 곳입니다. 모든 Discourse 관리자는 Discourse에 익숙하지만, GitHub에 익숙한 사람은 일부에 불과합니다.
'분류(classification)'가 정확히 무엇을 의미하나요? 그 부분에는 태그가 잘 작동할 것 같습니다.
#customization:plugin의 전용 하위 카테고리(sub-category)가 가장 적절하다고 생각합니다.
I propose moving all the helpful and efficient queries to one topic and closing it afterward.
This topic would be “the source of truth” for vetted queries.
We can then be a bit strict about the structure of entries that get added to that topic. Each entry would have a heading that describes it, a short blurb about what it does, and a mention to credit the author.
Once we do that, we can add a table of contents to that topic, and it would have a heading for each query.
To address Simon’s concern here.
The new version of the ToC component will have a real-time, in-post search bar that searches in the heading and the content of each section and looks like this.
(ignore the styles, for now, it’s still a WIP)
The new version will probably be production-ready around the end of the year.
As for the process of sharing/suggesting/requesting new queries, we can create a new topic for that. Good queries shared on that topic would then be added to the “the source of truth” topic that has the ToC.
더 나은 기업 활동은 데이터 탐색기에서 쿼리를 번들링하는 프로세스를 구축하는 것이라고 생각합니다.
예를 들어, 후보 쿼리를 포함하여 Contribute > Feature 태그와 함께 data-explorer #candidate-query를 생성할 수 있습니다. 이 기능은 왜 해당 쿼리가 번들링되어야 하는지, 그리고 그것이 어떻게 독특하고 중요한지를 설명합니다.
그 다음 제안이 유효한지 결정하고, 쿼리를 번들링한 후 이슈를 닫습니다.
원한다면 언제든지 거부된 번들링 요청을 탐색할 수 있습니다.
Expanding the queries natively available in Data Explorer would certainly be very helpful and accessible for a lot of admins/users.
However, I believe there also exists a need for ‘second tier’ queries, and a structured place to discuss them. I come to meta looking for a solution to a problem I have, not to donate clever queries per se.
Perhaps @sam’s and @Johani’s approaches could be combined? A subcategory with some topics/queries tagged as ‘official’ which are bundled with the plugin.
Small update on this one - we now have a #data-reporting category. 
I’ll have a read back through the suggestions in this topic and see if there are other ideas I can steal.
Conversation continued in Could we re-open the topic to share Explorer queries?