Our users are clamoring for signatures. It’s the one thing that has become the most consistent issue brought up so far. We cannot just ignore our audience, so I wanted to see what could be done.
While I understand the drawback of them, if there were an option that they were off by default, and users had the option to turn them on, I don’t see what the harm could be.
You are going to want to go into more detail than that.
One point of confusion:
So users can turn whether they see them on or off? Or they can enable/disable their own signature?
Also, if you can mockup screenshots of where you think these settings should exist, how the signature should be shown on a post, how the signature gets entered, etc. That would go a long way.
User signature (image) *Similar to the selection for User Card Background
Signature images will be shown below all messages, a max width of Xpx and max height of 200px
Quanto à aparência, não tenho certeza de que precise ser algo especial. A ideia é apenas que, para usuários que têm assinaturas ativamente exibidas, pareça que um usuário postou uma mensagem na parte inferior do tópico.
Uma coisa a ter em mente é que elas são frequentemente GIFs animados, então não queremos que o sistema as importe automaticamente como PNGs e as redimensione.
Thx @falco for typing the requirements. I’m going to make some adjustments..
Priority 1
an image upload (or URL field) to place a single image (.png, .jpg or .gif). Max file size and dimensions to be checked.
a site wide option to enable this text area and signatures in general
a per user option on profile to see signatures below posts.
Priority 2
a text area on user profile that accepts and compiles the same markdown of posts. Max characters and no images allowed.
This may seem like a low important feature, BUT, the alternative is that users manually place these animated GIFs in the body of their messages, meaning that more users have to see these images that actually don’t want to. They start embedding links to external images that get placed in our messages.
By creating this feature, we end up keeping our message content much cleaner and creating a distinction between message and signature.
“We are the essence of what we DO! The part we each play in the cosmos. Doing good deeds for others is leaving our signature on the world.” ― Angie Karan
That would be waaaaaaaaaay better handled on signature save. Think of the data-caped users! They may want signatures while @ home and let the option turned on, but when on mobile I have lost my datacap to a single page filled with gifs.
You can either find a size that is good enough for both (200kb maybe?) or remove all on mobile version.
Simplesmente não sabia quão fácil era redimensionar GIFs animados. Poderíamos pedir que os usuários fossem responsáveis pelo limite de tamanho do arquivo.
Acho que os usuários entenderiam se tornássemos a opção disponível apenas para desktop. Ou, novamente, tornássemos a opção dupla…
Exibir assinaturas de usuário
Desktop
Mobile
Again, I want to remind people when looking at this feature not to just think about the users who are asking for it, but the users who don’t want to be forced to see it by users placing signatures manually in their posts.
“We are the essence of what we DO! The part we each play in the cosmos. Doing good deeds for others is leaving our signature on the world.” ― Angie Karan
We had a number of users ask for these until we pointed out the User Cards.
Signatures are pretty disruptive to the overall process of reading and participating in forums, so I was really glad that profile cards sufficed for our group.
@sam. I respect your thoughts on this. I just want you to keep in mind that our audience is very passionate about this. Meaning they will insert their signatures (animated GIFs) manually in the meantime. So, by not putting the signature in a separate field where it can be handled properly, we are forcing the rest of our community to see them.
“We are the essence of what we DO! The part we each play in the cosmos. Doing good deeds for others is leaving our signature on the world.” ― Angie Karan
I agree. I think signatures are old-fashioned, just create clutter and don’t contribute to a conversation in any way. If someone says something interesting, I’ll view their card or click through to their profile to find out more about them.
@holden, se os usuários começassem a colar manualmente assinaturas em suas postagens, você não gostaria de ter a capacidade de desativá-las? Ao não ter um campo de assinatura, os usuários da nossa comunidade estão buscando começar a colá-las no corpo de suas mensagens. Minha sugestão é tornar a exibição das assinaturas uma preferência do usuário (padrão: não exibir)
„Somos a essência do que FAZEMOS! A parte que cada um de nós desempenha no cosmos. Fazer boas ações para os outros é deixar nossa assinatura no mundo.” ― Angie Karan