The first translation is ok…ish. But the second? Not really, is male-focused: activ vs activă. 
How can we ignore or hide this call-out for certain categories?
Each category is wrapped with its own class, so something like this:
.category-feature-announcements { // Hides it in Feature > Announcements
.post-notice {
display: none;
}
}
[class*="category-feature"] { // Hides it in Feature and all of its subcategories
.post-notice {
display: none;
}
}
[class*="category-feature"] is a wildcard attribute selector if anyone is wondering (so it matches anything containing category-feature; it also covers category-feature-example, which is how subcategories are structured). More on attribute selectors.
11 个赞
This has been a fantastic addition to our community, it really encourages people to welcome new members. I would actually like to see this extended a bit so it’s not just their first post. I’d like to see the first post notification stay the same, but then for the next ‘x’ number of posts it still shows a similar banner that they are new to the community since not everyone is going to see their first post, and anyone that did see that first post and welcomed them will likely remember that and not welcome them again.
2 个赞
Something is not quite right with those notes. On one of my instances a post from a user who I know has never posted in the forum at all received a notice
It’s been a while since we’ve seen *** name redacted *** — their last post was nov '18. It turned out that he had written a PM in November.
I’d like to suggest that PMs are not treated as “previous posts” in this feature.
On another instance, a PM that I received from someone who never posted on the forum and who - I believe - hasn’t posted a PM either, received a notice
It’s been a while since we’ve seen *** name *** — their last post was in Aug '18.
I’m not sure where the August 2018 thing comes from if he has never posted… If it’s a PM, it would be another example of the issue above. If I’ m right and he has never even posted a PM, it would be really puzzling.
If the notice is too prevalent, it becomes a crying 
and it won’t be effective.
Note that TL0 users still have a light grey username, so if you know what to look for you can still tell if someone is new and act appropriately.
4 个赞
@maja can you ensure we never display that notice for anon users?
5 个赞
Hmm no the anonymization code path would need to remove it anonymization time. Unless this is super super easy I would ignore it for now. So tiny. Also this is still correct in terms of the historical record, that is indeed the first time that user posted, so I am not even convinced this would be a useful thing to do.
1 个赞
I’m not able to reproduce this, seems to be fixed since this commit:
6 个赞
Isn’t there a similar feature where admins can leave banner notes above suspicious posts? Who can view the “admin warning” banners?
1 个赞
From community perspective is veeeeery useful Thanks for that
3 个赞
只是简单提个建议……首次用户公告功能很棒，但我好奇为什么它会显示在私信中？如果目的是让更广泛的受众欢迎新用户，它应该仅显示在公开话题中。如果可行的话，在评估用户的首条帖子时，应忽略私信中的帖子（我还没看过代码，所以这可能在实际实现中不太可行）。
2 个赞
请参阅 @awesomerobot 的原始帖子。
除了新用户或回归用户外，所有人都能看到该帖子提示。如果您希望全局隐藏这些提示，或仅在特定主题中隐藏，请从第一个帖子开始向下阅读。后续帖子将详细说明具体操作方法。
4 个赞
我认为您没有理解我的观点。
我喜欢显示帖子公告，因为它们有助于提升参与度。
问题在于，如果第一位用户的帖子是私信，那么首次发帖公告只会显示在那里（且只有收件人能看到）。
更好的做法是忽略私信，在首次公开发帖时显示首次发帖公告。这样能触达更广泛的受众，让新发帖者收到来自众多成员的欢迎。
4 个赞
关键在于，有些人认为即使在私信中，知道某人是否很久没有发帖也是有用的。但如果你认为这些消息不适合出现在私信中，你可以添加 CSS 来隐藏它们。
编辑：
哦！抱歉。所以，如果他们发送了一条私信，这会被视为他们很久以来的第一条帖子，因此他们下一条公开帖子就不会被算作“很久以来的第一条帖子”。抱歉，我也漏掉了这一点。
我明白了。这似乎有点属于边缘情况，但如果我推测代码的工作原理，那么应该只需要很小的调整，即可在进行“已有多久”的检查时忽略私信。
4 个赞
[quote=“Overgrow, 帖子：50, 主题：112078”]
问题在于，如果第一位用户的帖子是私信，那么首次发帖提示会显示在那里（且只有收件人能看到）。[/quote]
明白了。
1 个赞
谢谢……如果这个改动不会带来太多麻烦，那就太好了！
对我来说，这并非边缘情况，因为我尝试向每位成员发送个性化的欢迎私信 
2 个赞
不会发生这种情况，当前的行为是刻意设计的。另一个选择是进行 CSS 修改，正如 @pfaffman 指出的那样，您可以轻松自行完成。
2 个赞
