I’m wondering if there’s a way to remove canonical links entirely from a Discourse forum. I’m referring to the /2, /3, /4, etc extensions that show up for each topic URL as a user scrolls down the page. I would like to have every reply within a topic simply refer to the original URL (not redirectin…

[画像] RGJ: [画像] SethWilliams: over 30,000 low-quality URLs were added to our sitemap over the course of 12 months Are you sure about this? I have never seen a post number in a site map. Thanks for questioning this. “Sitemap” was probably the wrong word to use. What I meant was that thes…

[画像] SethWilliams: If these numbers simply weren’t added to every single reply, Google would only be able to see the original post URL. Yeah, and if Google would be honoring those rel="canonical" meta tags (which they invented!) that were put in there specifically to prevent Google from doing…

Sounds good. It would be ideal if it’s off by default, because it’s not inconceivable that it could cause topic pages to disappear from Google or other search engines. I’m not sure if it was already mentioned, but another way to fix it without noindex might be to use URL fragments for the posts, si…

[画像] j127: I’m not sure if it was already mentioned, but another way to fix it without noindex might be to use URL fragments for the posts, since those shouldn’t get counted as separate pages. Thanks for the suggestion. I’d like to think that would work… but seeing as how the original “correc…

[画像] SethWilliams: but seeing as how the original “correct” method isn’t even working, it makes me skeptical that anything will solve the problem other than just eliminating the numbered replies altogether. That would remove the ability to link to specific posts though. There would be no way …

[画像] j127: That would remove the ability to link to specific posts though. There would be no way to link to post #789 in a 1,000-post topic, and it would be annoying for users to have to scroll that far. It could be slightly more annoying, but if the page=2, page=3, etc URLs still work (which…

[画像] j127: they should probably be the same, because the pages are otherwise almost identical. No, /8 is not the same as the topic. /8 points to the 8th post and the timestamp corresponds to that of the 8th post. If you compare the ?page=2 variant to the actual post it links to then you will…

[画像] SethWilliams: Accounting for the dates and times of each post and reply is sort of an integral part of how forums work. I’m not saying to remove time information, but just that it would be better to only send the machine-readable timestamp for the top post. From the perspective of rankin…

[画像] Falco: to add a X-Robots-Tag: noindex header to the response payload of those pages. This is in. If you want to enable this experimental feature, you need to flip the value to the hidden site setting SiteSetting.allow_indexing_non_canonical_urls. Please share the results with us.

[画像] j127: I’m not saying to remove time information, but just that it would be better to only send the machine-readable timestamp for the top post. From the perspective of ranking a page in search results, a forum topic is basically an article (top post) with a bunch of comments on it. It doesn…

トピックURL内の各返信の/2、/3、/4などのリンクを削除する

開発

Falco (Falco) 2021 年 11 月 25 日午後 9:26 24

これは完了しています。この実験的な機能を有効にしたい場合は、非表示のサイト設定 SiteSetting.allow_indexing_non_canonical_urls の値を切り替える必要があります。

結果を共有してください。

トピック		返信	表示
Search engines now blocked from indexing non-canonical pages Announcements seo	23	4779	2022 年 3 月 15 日
Sitelinks in Google disappearing Community Building	26	1768	2023 年 1 月 27 日
Why isn't Google Indexing Discourse? SEO concerns Support seo	31	6265	2024 年 6 月 1 日
Adding Canonical Redirects for SEO Optimization Support	23	7655	2015 年 10 月 1 日
Pagination URL scheme not passed through when topic is renamed Feature	21	4295	2015 年 5 月 20 日

トピックURL内の各返信の/2、/3、/4などのリンクを削除する

関連トピック