Send a canonical link header instead of a noindex header. https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/16113 Sending a canonical header likely has the same advantage on crawling budget as sending a noindex header - without the SEO implications of excluding urls which might have backlinks via noinde…

I am struggling with this, reading the recommendation from Google it seems it does not particularly care. The recommendations for the rel="canonical" HTTP header are the same as rel="canonical" link tag. I guess not much to lose and it is possible that a mix of no index plus rel canonical is the…

This is rolling back the recently introduced site setting into what’s basically a noop (moving what we send as a head tag in a header, no semantic change). I do not want this change as is.

[imagem] sam: I guess not much to lose and it is possible that a mix of no index plus rel canonical is the right Google recipe. But I am just not sure. For the new default SiteSetting.allow_indexing_non_canonical_urls = false this is the way it’s implemented right now - and it stays this way…

[imagem] Falco: This is rolling back the recently introduced site setting into what’s basically a noop (moving what we send as a head tag in a header, no semantic change). This change is not a ‘noop’: Google might handle headers and html content in different stages of its processing-queues. …

[imagem] Falco: This is rolling back the recently introduced site setting into what’s basically a noop (moving what we send as a head tag in a header, no semantic change). I do not want this change as is. The noindex change has been rolled back recently: Search engines now blocked from ind…

Not strongly against this but it feels so minor. Google is always downloading content these days, I doubt saving an HTML parse is really going to make any material difference. Lots of other areas need focus first, the microdata is probably the first place that needs TLC.

Enviar cabeçalho de link canônico em vez de cabeçalho noindex

Dev

rrit (Ayke) 20 Março , 2022 14:10 6

A mudança de noindex foi revertida recentemente:

Search engines now blocked from indexing non-canonical pages - #30 by sam
FEATURE: enable canonical url indexing by SamSaffron · Pull Request #16196 · discourse/discourse · GitHub

Você pode dar uma nova olhada neste PR:

Tópico		Respostas	Vistas
Search engines now blocked from indexing non-canonical pages Announcements seo	23	4582	15 Março , 2022
3 Pages Indexed in Google with same canonical tag Feature	1	547	8 Novembro , 2020
Homepage doesn't have canonical URL Feature	9	1986	4 Janeiro , 2020
Canonical Meta Data Does Not Change Correctly in Discourse App when not loaded by a webcrawler Feature	5	975	1 Agosto , 2020
I want to Update rel=canonical href using Java Script Support	18	4381	2 Agosto , 2020

Enviar cabeçalho de link canônico em vez de cabeçalho noindex

Related topics