Gmail 对话中的发件人名称

A typical Gmail thread will look like this:

image

Note that the sender names are listed (with an ellipsis if there are too many)

With discourse they look like this:

image

There are really 98 different senders in that thread but on first look it appears they have all come from the same person!

So many times this messes me up when I think e.g. “Why is X sending another message on this thread? I thought they just posted 2 minutes ago?” (Incidentally I have the same experience with Github notifications.)

It also means that new contributors to the thread are not as visible as they would otherwise be:

Compare:

image

(clearly a new contribution from Jason) with

image

The latter unread email is actually from a user named Sergio, not Knightrider.

Can anything can be done about this?

I assume that what causes it is all the Discourse emails coming from the same ‘From’ address. Could we not have a separate ‘From’ address on the Discourse site’s domain unique to each user? So I might be user-32q7qwhfwp@meta.discourse.com and any notifications of posts I’ve sent would come from that address?

Would this cause deliverability issues? I would hope not as long as the meta.discourse.com domain is verified with Mailgun or whoever…

Or maybe I’m wrong about the issue here. Thoughts welcome.

6 个赞

Yeah maybe we should use plus addressing here, change:

From: Sam Saffron via Discourse Meta <meta@discoursemail.com>

To:

From: Sam Saffron via Discourse Meta <meta+sam@discoursemail.com>

Seems to me like a small change and it could make gmail look nicer.

@gerhard any concerns here? If not, go ahead and make the change.

Are we 100% sure every site running Discourse supports plus addressing? I know it is required for incoming mail, so perhaps that’s a safe assumption?

Thing is, nobody is even meant to email this address, the reply to here goes to discourse mail.

2 个赞

Probably fine, just worried about possible side effects. I support trying it out, but at the same time it feels a bit strange to me as we are “personalizing” the email address so the odds of someone seeing it and assuming that

meta+sam@discoursemail.com

is somehow an email they can use to reply to Sam… is much higher now versus

meta@discoursemail.com

Thinking about this a bit more I feel this is kind of a nasty hack and has the possibility to do more harm than good.

5 个赞

关于这一点的更新:Gmail 似乎已经解决了这个问题。

这是同一个讨论串(现在多了两条消息,但这无关紧要):

image

有人知道这是如何/何时发生的吗?

我在想,他们是否在构建讨论串参与者列表时,开始仅根据姓名而非发件人邮箱地址进行匹配。

3 个赞

太好了!据我所知,我们自一月份以来在己方这边没有任何改动。

2 个赞