我觉得我最近在这里看到过关于这个的其他帖子或主题，但我找不到了。
当我在这里搜索“feature”时，结果中包含一个指向 Contribute > Feature 分类的链接。
但是当我搜索“pr-welcome”时，pr-welcome 标签没有显示在结果中。
如果它能显示出来就好了，这样会让标签匹配更容易被发现，而且这也是导航到特定标签的一种简便方法。
5 个赞
I think it does if you use pr-welcome instead of pr-welcome
1 个赞
Good point. Guess that solves the “quick way to navigate” use case. Would still like it to work without the # to increase discoverability.
Not sure it would be a good idea. Search is usually a tradeoff between relevancy, speed, index time/volume and query complexity ( aka special keywords/filters/options). Making tags part of the directly searchable keywords would hurt relevancy in some cases ( how do you rank a post containing pr-welcome in body versus a post tagged pr-welcome?) and probably hurt performance.
It’s easy to see a query and say this should be first and this second… but once you take all the cases in consideration it’s much harder.
2 个赞
How so? I’d say that a hit in a tag is almost always worth more than a hit in the post content.
Besides, if your argument applied to tags it would also apply to categories (which are apparently included in the search).
Really? What are a few dozen (or even a few hundred) tags in the sea of post content?
我并没有建议对主题和帖子的排名或相关性确定方式进行任何更改。这或许值得进一步调查，但这并不是我想表达的意思。
我只希望看到 pr-welcome 标签本身在“显示更多”下方显示，就像第一张截图中 Contribute > Feature 类别链接的显示方式一样。
我本应该在截图中加上醒目的红色箭头以更明确地指出这一点。我现在正在使用手机，所以暂时无法轻松更新它们，但希望这能澄清我想表达的内容。
3 个赞
As I said it’s a tradeoff, it’s not because it has been done on one thing that we should do it for everything (opposite being true too).
If we follow your idea “tag > content”… content match versus tag match will always be low in results, so searching a term wich also happens to be a tag will be almost impossible.
1 个赞
That’s exactly the edge case because of which I said
But even that could be handled by making it so that hits in tags are treated the same as hits in content unless there is at least one search term that does not match a tag. Or you could simply treat tags as content, full stop.
As I said, tradeoffs. This kind of “if” is not free. For every query we now have to match against the full list of tags each word, where before we would just have to search for a #, totally different story.
And making it part of the searchable content, is just making it slower. The sooner you can reduce the list of potential results the faster it will be, so filtering on a tag with #tag and then adding a query will be probably much faster than full search on “tag query”.
1 个赞
Much of this conversation seems off-topic to me.
I updated the original post to better clarify what is being asked for here.
3 个赞
Adding tags to the “category hit” section is totally pr-welcome agree we should add it. We will need to be careful at ordering the tags list and culling it if it is too long. (Imagine 1000 tags called spam-1 spam-2 spam-3, though lovely, it could kill off that whole UI. So show popular spam tag first)
4 个赞
I agree with this, can you add it to your list @neil? Just show top X matching tags, ordered by tag frequency.
2 个赞
