The way you’ve described it doesn’t sound like it’s a current feature of the review queue.
You generally see the view full conversation option on flags that also create a PM to the moderators group (the ‘something else’ and ‘illegal’ flag types). Pressing that will take you to the PM itself rather than the reviewable in the queue.
There’s no time delay on when that option becomes visible, it should be there immediately on the flag landing in the queue. And the spam, off-topic, and inappropriate flags don’t have that button at all (as they don’t generate a PM with extra detail in).
Does that match up with what you’re seeing in your Review Queue?
עבור המוגדרים כברירת מחדל של דואר זבל, על תקלה, ותוכן לא הולם, אינני מאמין שניתן לערוך את התנהגותם.
עם זאת, קיימת האפשרות ליצור דגלים מותאמים אישית שבהם תוכל להגדיר אם הם דורשים פירוט נוסף (ומכאן ייווצר הודעה פרטית וכן תהליך סקירה בתור שמביא לכפתור kbdסקור שיחה מלאה/kbd). אני חושב שתהיה אפשרות לבטל את המוגדרים כברירת מחדל ולהחליף אותם בגרסאות מותאמות אישית שכוללות את הבחירה בה text ‘עורר את המשתמשים לספק סיבות נוספות’.
אתה יכול למצוא את אפשרויות הדגלים המותאמים באזור הניהול שלך (/admin/config/flags).
Do you want to reply to the user who flagged the post or do you want a conversation with staff members?
I think usually you use the staff category for the latter. As a workaround you could flag the post as “something else” yourself.
Maybe Review with reason would also help you but I think it only works for comments while you take action
הבעיה עלתה לראשונה כאשר אחד המתפעילים הצביע על כך שהם רוצים להגיב להצהרה מבלי לנקוט בפעולה, אך האפשרות צפה בשיחה מלאה לא הייתה קיימת.
אלחץ על האפשרות של הדגל מותאמת אישית שהוזכרה על ידי @JammyDodger
[הקלד=“מוין, פוסט:5, נושא:367337”]
כפתור שיכול לשמש כפתרון הוא לסמן את הפוסט כ’משהו אחר’ בעצמך.
[/הקלד]
האם זה אפשרי לעשות זאת לאחר שכבר סימנו את הפוסט?
Yes, you can’t delete a flag (even a custom one) once it’s been used as you need the data for historical reasons so it doesn’t break the review queue.
Disabling one will remove it from the flag menu and leave only the enabled ones as ‘live’ flag options for your community to make use of.
Though as you’re looking for an option where staff can discuss flags you may want to consider Moin’s idea. It may suit your site to ask for more details on every flag, but if that’s not the main intention then the flipside to consider is that it adds more effort/friction for the user flagging a post (which may lead to them giving up before reporting something)
I think you could likely do this with a little extra CSS in a custom theme component, but I’d need to be on my laptop to check properly. Hopefully someone can jump in with a more specific answer.
Hiding it for non-staff with CSS would be cosmetic, so it could still be revealed by a savvy user piddling about in their browser inspector, etc. But if it’s not personal info or security related then this approach is generally considered to be acceptable.
@Rubi I think something like this would do the trick: (though you’d need to put in the correct custom name of your flag rather than custom_inappropriate)
Continuing my wonderful Discourse journey (for context only been using it for 6 months now), I want to check and confirm something relevant to this topic.
I tested this now with something that had been flagged as Inappropriate.
Obviously, Inappropriate does not open the flag for conversation but Something Else does.
We then have 2 flags on the same post: if I then accept the flag and, say, delete the post the system then records both flags as having been acted upon.
Is this correct?
Are there any side-effects or other unintended consequences to having 2 flags on the same post?
Having two flags (or even more) on the same post is quite normal. Generally they come from different community members reporting issues with the same post.
I don’t believe a ‘something else’ flag counts towards auto-hiding the post, so I don’t think they’ll be any adverse effects from adding a ‘staff discussion’ one.