Terminology: topics vs threads

I was curious to see a discussion about why topics are called topics and not threads (the more common term in online forums, according to my experience) but so far I have not been able to find any. Has this really not been discussed previously?

Personally, I have gotten used to the discourse terminology but I find it somewhat of a pain when trying to explain things to new users, as “topic” is not intuitively understood while thread is well known from email and other online forums. Yet, I am reluctant to customize the terminology assuming that the default terminology was a very conscious choice by the discourse team…

4개의 좋아요

From a non-english point of view, I think that “thread” is a terminology related to the forum technology (as “the string of all posts”), while “topic” is related to discussions (as the “subject under discussion”). So if this is a platform for discussions I think “topic” is the right term.

5개의 좋아요

Thread is a technical computer geek term, also it implies threading. So worth avoiding for both of those reasons.

4개의 좋아요

Topic is perfectly appropriate in ways that thread never can be:

  • A topic describes content. As others have already pointed out, a thread describes the mode of operation where messages are connected in threads.
  • Thread is also a literary term but a topic describes focus at a higher level than a thread which, in literary terms, always runs through a larger body of text.
  • A thread is interior to a topic. One topic can have many threads. New topics become new threads.
  • A topic is more focussed than a thread. Topics are major parts whereas threads are minor parts in the main discussion.
  • Technically, you do not have a thread until there is at least a message in response/reply.
  • Likewise, in computer systems threads don’t normally exist independently. They normally execute from a process. However, there are exceptions which is another reason for avoiding the technical computing term where threads are concerned.
10개의 좋아요

Sure, but isn’t banning the word going a little too far? It prevented me from quoting the above.

2개의 좋아요

Not from my perspective, it isn’t.

Hm, never mind the banning of whichever word, but maybe quotes should be excluded?

1개의 좋아요

why is “t h r e a d” a banned word?

See here:

(^^Onebox is not working because I had to remove the word t h r e a d from the URL :roll_eyes:)

2개의 좋아요

Haha, there is a way:

Now what do you say? :sunglasses:

I’d say this one is the crucial post:

4개의 좋아요

Oy! I just asked this same question to a Discourse Team member I am working about a data migration. I was trying to describe an issue and Discourse wouldn’t let me use the “bad word”. Really? I’d understand if it was the F-word or something like that, but…

As a result, I had to stop what I was doing to post screenshot like Steve did above. The whole thing slowed me down in trying to communicate.

2개의 좋아요

Hi Barbara,
See: Why is the word "thread" not allowed on Meta? - #9 by codinghorror for more details .

Hi Hawk,

Yes, I saw Jeff’s posting. I understand you may not want it on Meta, but this was my own Discourse instance, following a data migration where a “string” (allowed?) of continuous posts was broken up into 5 separate ones ("bad words:). I’m in communication with your Team member and he’ll resolve my separate question. Thanks.

B.

It was actually Meta that threw the error – your emails go straight into our team PM inbox.
It is unrelated to the issue on your site.

4개의 좋아요