The discussion revolves around the upcoming “Using Events for Discourse 3.0” webinar. nathank suggests using the Discourse Events feature to manage registrations instead of Zoom, and proposes Jitsi as an alternative.
nathank is also concerned about having to re-register details that are already available on Meta. HAWK explains that this is due to privacy concerns and the need for explicit permission to use Meta account details for other purposes.
nathank questions whether the event is organized by meta.discourse.org or CDCK, and expresses frustration that privacy concerns can be used as an excuse to avoid sharing data in beneficial ways. HAWK clarifies that CDCK and meta.discourse.org are the same entity and acknowledges the complexity of the issue, stating that it’s a work in progress.
We need to register all our details?!? But you already have them.
Might I suggest making use of the events part of #calendar to manage this instead of offloading it to the unintegrated Zoom? And maybe considering using Jitsi or some other open source solution?
I guess the key is whether this event is arranged by meta.discourse.org or by CDCK itself (if those entities are truly separate).
Personally, if I RSVP’d within meta.discourse.org I’d expect my data to be utilised for something like this. Ditto for a zoom.org webinar ‘owned’ by CDCK.
In my domain (health) ‘privacy’ is often used as an inappropriate excuse by those who don’t want to go to the trouble to safely share data in ways that benefit the user (in our case the patient). And patients generally suffer as a result while the corporate butt is covered. Not cool.
I hear you, but this is a long standing puzzle that we’re working through with privacy lawyers across a lot of planes. It stems from being a product-led company for so long. Now we have marketing there is lots to untangle.